To avoid violating your obligation to keep the client’s communications confidential, you should:
discuss only the supervising attorney’s opinion about the client’s chance for victory, but never the underlying facts,
discuss the facts, but never the underlying strategy, with outside individuals.
not talk about the case to anyone since it could violate a duty of confidentiality
not talk about the case to anyone except your spouse or other person with whom you ordinarily share private information
which 1?
discuss only the supervising attorney’s opinion about the client’s chance for victory, but never the underlying facts.
The best option would be option A.
Reason : under attorney client privilege, the facts of the case are covered, which means communication with client, documents, etc are covered and can't be discussed about with anyone except a fellow attorney sharing the same legal duty of confidentiality like you have to your attorney. Just discussing chances of win or loss don't violate this duty and hence OPTION A.
To avoid violating your obligation to keep the client’s communications confidential, you should: discuss only the...
To avoid violating your obligation to keep the client’s communications confidential, you should: discuss only the supervising attorney’s opinion about the client’s chance for victory, but never the underlying facts, discuss the facts, but never the underlying strategy, with outside individuals. not talk about the case to anyone since it could violate a duty of confidentiality not talk about the case to anyone except your spouse or other person with whom you ordinarily share private information which 1?
A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...