H purchases components from three suppliers. Components purchased from A are priced at $4.5 each and used at the rate of 20,000 units per year. Components purchased from B are priced at $5 each and are used at the rate of 3,500 units per year. Components purchased from C are priced at $4.7 each and used at the rate of 1,000 units per year. Currently, H purchases a separate truckload from each supplier. As part of its JIT drive, H has decided to aggregate purchases from the three suppliers. The trucking company charges a fixed cost of $550 for the truck with an additional charge of $80 for each stop. Thus, if H asks for a pickup from only one supplier, the trucking company charges $630; from two suppliers, it charges $710; and from three suppliers, it charges $790. Suggest a replenishment strategy (lots ordered independently or jointly?) for Harley that minimizes annual cost. Assume a holding cost of 25% per year.
A replenishment strategy where lots are ordered jointly minimizes annual cost.
| Component A | Component B | ComponentC | |||
| Demand, Da | 20000 | Demand, Db | 3500 | Demand, Dc | 1000 |
| Shipping pickup, S = Fixed cost (550) + one stop (80) | $ 630.00 | Shipping pickup, S | $ 630.00 | Shipping pickup, S | $ 630.00 |
| Price | $ 4.50 | Price | $ 5.00 | Price | $ 4.70 |
| Holding cost, Ha | $ 1.125 | Holding cost, Hb | $ 1.00 | Holding cost, Hc | $ 0.94 |
| (25% of the price) | (25% of the price) | (25% of the price) | |||
| EOQ = Sqrt(2DS/H) | 4732.86 | EOQ | 2100.00 | EOQ | 1157.77 |
| Current Strategy - Ordered individually | |||||
| Cycle inventory = D/EOQ | 4.23 | 1.67 | 0.86 | ||
| Inventory cost = (EOQ*H)/2 | $ 2,662.24 | Inventory cost = (EOQ*H)/2 | $ 1,050.00 | Inventory cost = (EOQ*H)/2 | $ 544.15 |
| Order cost = (D/EOQ) * 500 | $ 2,662.24 | Order cost = (D/EOQ) * 500 | $ 1,050.00 | Order cost = (D/EOQ) * 500 | $ 544.15 |
| Total inventory cost current strategy= 2662.24+1050+544.15 | $ 4,256.390 | ||||
| Total order cost current strategy | $ 4,256.390 | ||||
| Total cost Current strategy | $ 8,512.78 | (4256.39+4256.39) | |||
| New Shipping cost, Sn = 790 | $ 790.00 | ||||
| Optimal joint order frequency, N | |||||
| n* = SQRT((DAHa + DBHb + DcHC)/(2S*)) | |||||
| DAHa + DBHb + DcHC = | 26940 | ||||
| 2S | 1,580.00 | ||||
| n*= sqrt (26940/1580) | 4.13 | ||||
| Order Quantity for A, Qa = Da/n* | 4843.50 | Order Quantity for B, Qb = Db/n* | 847.61 | Order Quantity for C, Qc = Dc/n* | 242.18 |
| Inventory cost = (Q*H)/2 | $ 2,724.47 | Inventory cost = (Q*H)/2 | $ 423.81 | Inventory cost = (Q*H)/2 | $ 113.82 |
| Total inventory cost new strategy | $ 3,262.10 | ||||
| Total order cost new strategy= 790*4.13 | $ 3,262.10 | ||||
| Saving in Inventory cost | $ 994.29 | ||||
| Saving in ordering cost | $ 994.29 | ||||
| Total Savings | $ 1,988.58 |
H purchases components from three suppliers. Components purchased from A are priced at $4.5 each and...
Harley Davidson purchases components from three suppliers. Components purchased from Supplier A are priced at $ 5 each and used at the rate of 206700 units per year. Components purchased from Supplier B are priced at $ 4 each and are used at the rate of 25,000 units per year. Components purchased from Supplier C are priced at $ 5 each and used at the rate of 10,000 units per year. Currently Harley purchases a separate truckload from each supplier. As...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $13 $14 2 $10 $11 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Problem 9-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $11 $12 $15 2 $11 $10 $11 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However,...
Problem 9-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $11 $11 $13 2 $10 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Component Supplier 1 2 $12 $13 $11 $12 3 $10 $10 Se 2 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Problem 4-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows Supplier Component $10 $14 $10 $12$12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as Edwards provides sufficient...
Problem 4-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 13 1 $12 $13 510 2 $11 $12 s10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However,...
Benson Manufacturing is considering ordering electronic components from three different suppliers. The suppliers may differ in terms of quality in that the proportion or percentage of defective components may differ among the suppliers. To evaluate the proportion defective components for the suppliers, Benson has requested a sample shipment of 500 components from each supplier. The number of defective components and the number of good components found in each shipment is as follows. Supplier Component 10 35 Good 490 465 455...
Benson Manufacturing is considering ordering electronic components from three different suppliers. The suppliers may differ in terms of quality in that the proportion or percentage of defective components may differ among the suppliers. To evaluate the proportion defective components for the suppliers, Benson has requested a sample shipment of 500 components from each supplier. The number of defective components and the number of good components found in each shipment is as follows. Supplier Component A B C Defective 15 35...
A linear programming computer package is needed. Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows. Supplier Component 2 1 $11 $12 $13 2 $9 $10 59 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can...