Homework Help Question & Answers

Provide facts and outcome on the Fleisher versus Commissioner of internal revenue court case pertaining to refund claim...

Provide facts and outcome on the Fleisher versus Commissioner of internal revenue court case pertaining to refund claims.
0 0
Next > < Previous
ReportAnswer #1

Mr. Fleischer is a certified financial planner who owns numerous insurance licenses and securities, inclusive of the Series 6, 7, 24, 63 and 65. In his individual capacity, on February 2, 2006 he entered into an independent contractor representative agreement with LPL Financial Services. He set up an S-Corp known as Fleischer Wealth Plan on February 7, 2006; and he himself was the sole owner and officer. He entered into an employment agreement with FWP, under which FWP on February 28, 2006; and paid himself a salary in his capacity as a financial adviser. But it was noted by the court that the Employment Agreement did not include a provision which needed him to remit any fees or commission from LPL to FWP. In his individual capacity on March 13, 2008 he entered into a broker contract with MassMutual Financial Group wherein he was an independent contractor, and in that broker contract there was no mention of FWP. Both MassMutual and LPL reported on Form 1099s payments made to Fleischer, the individual. He having transferred those payments to FWP, thus lead those payments to be reflected on the FWP's corporate tax returns, and filed his own personal returns showing that he was not responsible for any self-employment taxes. The Internal Revenue Service upon review took the decision that Mr. Fleischer was responsible for deficiencies in self-employment tax based on the logic that the income from Mass Mutual and LPL was earned by him, and not FWP.

The tax court decision included the following findings:

-- FWP holds no contractual relationship with MassMutual or LPL;

-- The revenue was attributable to contracts among Mr. Fleischer (not FWP) and third parties;

-- The Employment Agreement does not required him to remit revenues Fleischer received to FWP;

-- There was lack of indication that either MassMutual or LPLwere updated that Mr. Fleischer was employed by FWP

Know the answer?
Add Answer of:
Provide facts and outcome on the Fleisher versus Commissioner of internal revenue court case pertaining to refund claim...
Your Answer: Your Name: What's your source?
Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • provide facts and outcome on teri jordan v commissioner tax court case.

    provide facts and outcome on teri jordan v commissioner tax court case.

  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion...

    The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion in requiring Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. ("taxpayer"), to use the accrual method of accounting to compute its federal taxes for the tax years at issue. In particular, the Commissioner contests the Tax Court's finding that emulsified asphalt is not "merchandise," as that term is used in 26 C.F.R.S 1.471-1. The Tax Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C.SS 6213, 6214, and 7442. We...

  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion...

    The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion in requiring Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. ("taxpayer"), to use the accrual method of accounting to compute its federal taxes for the tax years at issue. In particular, the Commissioner contests the Tax Court's finding that emulsified asphalt is not "merchandise," as that term is used in 26 C.F.R.S 1.471-1. The Tax Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C.SS 6213, 6214, and 7442. We...

  • Surgery: Iturrade V. Hilo Medical Center USA Overview: The final case study for this course will require you to analyze...

    Surgery: Iturrade V. Hilo Medical Center USA Overview: The final case study for this course will require you to analyze a court decision in which a physician was found liable for medical malpractice. You will focus on facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation, and you will explain how they were applied to law. You will then use the facts of the case to identify an ethics issue and determine an ethical theory that...

  • BUSINESS LAW Please analyze the case "Bozzio v. EMI Group, Ltd." shown below. Write a personal...

    BUSINESS LAW Please analyze the case "Bozzio v. EMI Group, Ltd." shown below. Write a personal analysis and discussion on case that includes the following: brief intro and relate case to life, explain issue, provide ruling, and elaborate on analysis. Below is an example of response structure as well. Downey v. Bob's Discount Furniture Holdings, Inc._Case in Point 3.4 Text Page 63 by Student 1 - Sunday, August 31, 7:26 AM This case intrigued me because it raised the question...

  • Brief a case: IRAC Method - Hammond v. The State: S94P1145

    Michael Mears, Nancy L. Mau, Clive A. Stafford-Smith, Robert L. McGlasson II, for appellant.Emmanuel Hammond was convicted of the malice murder, armed robbery and kidnapping of Julie Love. He was sentenced to death for the conviction of murder. Onappeal, we found no reversible error in the issues raised by Hammond, but because we "perceive[d] a possible issue as to ineffectiveness of counsel," Hammondv. State, 260 Ga. 591, 599 (398 SE2d 168) (1990), we remanded the case to the trial court...

  • Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine...

    Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine and how it was used to determine the year of inclusion in taxable income. How does the constructive receipt doctrine impact a cash-basis individual’s taxable income? What factors could have resulted in a different determination? 47 T.C. 428 (1967) PAUL V. HORNUNG, PETITIONER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Docket No. 3740-64. United States Tax Court. Filed January 27, 1967. 429*429 Michael J. Clare,...

  • Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine...

    Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine and how it was used to determine the year of inclusion in taxable income and answer both question. How does the constructive receipt doctrine impact a cash-basis individual’s taxable income? What factors could have resulted in a different determination? 47 T.C. 428 (1967) PAUL V. HORNUNG, PETITIONER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Docket No. 3740-64. United States Tax Court. Filed January 27, 1967....

  • H&R BLOCK Tax Analyst Certification - Case Study 2 Prepare a return using BlockWorks in PRACTICE...

    H&R BLOCK Tax Analyst Certification - Case Study 2 Prepare a return using BlockWorks in PRACTICE mode. Access and use the BlockWorks shell return by entering the following four-digit code: 6102. A unique SSN will be generated by the software. Be sure to note this unique shell SSN so that you will be able to re-access this return. Prepare a 2017 Schedule E (Form 1040) for Mona. Any of Mona's information that is not associated with the Schedule E (Form...

Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
Share Your Knowledge

Post an Article
Post an Answer
Post a Question with Answer

Self-promotion: Authors have the chance of a link back to their own personal blogs or social media profile pages.