According to the 80% rule, the minimum coverage that Shen should have purchased for his property is $192,000 ($240,000 x 80%). If that threshold had been met, any and all partial damages to James's home would be paid by the insurance company. But since Shen did not buy the minimum amount of coverage, the insurance company would only pay for the proportion of the minimum coverage represented by the actual amount of insurance purchased ($144,000/$192,000), which amounts to 75% of the damages. Therefore, the insurance company would pay out (reimburse) $86,400 ($115200*75%) and, unfortunately, Shen would have to pay the remaining $28,800 herself.
7. Reimbursement on property damage Aa Aa Shen's Replacement Cost Coverage Shen recently purchased a $144,000...
1. If a new building has a replacement cost of $750,000, what is the minimum amount of insurance required to comply with an 80% coinsurance requirement? Questions 2-5 apply to the following situation: A commercial building that has a value of $600,000 is insured on a Broad Perils policy with a coverage limit of $400,000. and a deductible of $1,000. 2. There is a fire loss in the amount of $250,000. There is an 80% co-insurance clause. How much will...