Solution:
Required 1:
| Double-declining balance | Depreciation |
| Year 1 (2015) | $ 11,000 |
| Year 2 (2016) | $ 8,800 |
| Year 3 (2017) | $ 7,040 |
| Year 4 (2018) | $ 5,632 |
Note:
1) Calculation of depreciation under Double-Declining Balance Method:
| Year | Opening Balance | Depreciation | Accumulated Depreciation | Ending Balance |
| $ 55,000 | ||||
| Year 1 (2015) | $ 55,000 | $ 11,000 | $ 11,000 | $ 44,000 |
| Year 2 (2016) | $ 44,000 | $ 8,800 | $ 19,800 | $ 35,200 |
| Year 3 (2017) | $ 35,200 | $ 7,040 | $ 26,840 | $ 28,160 |
| Year 4 (2018) | $ 28,160 | $ 5,632 | $ 32,472 | $ 22,528 |
2) Depreciation Rate under Straight Line Method = 1 / Useful life of asset = 1 /10= 10%
Depreciation Rate under Double-Declining Balance Method = Depreciation Rate under Straight Line Method*2
= 10%*2 = 20%
Required 2:
| No | Event | General Journal | Debit | Credit |
| 1 | 1 | Depreciation Expense | $ 10,472 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | $ 10,472 | |||
| [ Being depreciation expense] |
Depreciation expense for 2018 = Closing balance under Straight Line Method in 2018 - Closing balance under Double Declining Balance Method in 2018
= $ 33,000 ( Given) - $ 22,528 (Note:1 Above) = $10,472
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods...
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm. Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/2021 year-end financial statements for Company B: Income Statement Depreciation $ 13,500 expense...
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm. Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/2021 year-end financial statements for Company B: Income Statement Depreciation $7,500 expense $...
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm. Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/2021 year-end financial statements for Company B: Income Statement Depreciation expense $ 11,500...
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow
companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation
methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare
periodic performance from firm to firm.
Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the
performance of two companies. Company A uses the
double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the
straight-line method. You have the following information taken from
the 12/31/2021 year-end financial statements for Company
B:
Income Statement
Depreciation expense
$
12,500...
Check my work The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm. 2.16 points Skipped Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/18 year-end financial statements for Company eBook...
Problem 11-1 Depreciation methods; change in methods (LO11-2, 11-6] The fact that generally accepted accounting principles alow companies flexibity in choosing between certain a location methods can make dilcult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies Company A uses the double-declining- balance depreciation method Company Buses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/19 year end financial...
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm. Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/2021 year-end financial statements for Company B: Income StatementDepreciation expense$10,000 Balance SheetAssets:Plant and equipment, at cost$200,000Less:...
How do I use the double-declining-balance method, a time-based
method, to calculate the depreciation expense for Asset A in year
2017?
Depreciation Methods Vorst Corporation's schedule of depreciable assets at December 31, 2016, was as follows: Asset Cost Accumulated Acquisition Residual Depreciation Date Value $ 64,000 2015 $20,000 36,000 2014 10,000 A $100,000 B 55,000 с 70,000 33,600 2014 14,000 $225,000 $133,600 $44,000 Vorst takes a full year's depreciation expense in the year of an asset's acquisition and no depreciation...
Riverbed Company changed depreciation methods in 2017 from
double-declining-balance to straight-line. Depreciation prior to
2017 under double-declining-balance was $82,300, whereas
straight-line depreciation prior to 2017 would have been $45,800.
Riverbed’s depreciable assets had a cost of $252,700 with a $43,200
salvage value, and an 8-year remaining useful life at the beginning
of 2017.
Prepare the 2017 journal entry related to Riverbed’s depreciable
assets (Equipment). (Credit account titles are
automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent
manually. If no...
Grouper Company changed depreciation methods in 2017 from
double-declining-balance to straight-line. Depreciation prior to
2017 under double-declining-balance was $97,100, whereas
straight-line depreciation prior to 2017 would have been $49,600.
Grouper’s depreciable assets had a cost of $254,300 with a $42,000
salvage value, and an 8-year remaining useful life at the beginning
of 2017.
Prepare the 2017 journal entry related to Grouper’s depreciable
assets (Equipment). (Credit account titles are
automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent
manually. If no...