Question

E. E. Cummings Company manufactures a high-tech component that passes through two production processing departments, Molding and Assembly. Department managers are partially compensated on the basis of units of products completed and transferred out relative to units of product put into production. This was intended as encouragement to be efficient and to minimize waste. Wendy Soo is the department head in the Molding Department, and Bart Fender is her quality control inspector. During the month of June, Wendy had three new employees who were not yet technically skilled. As a result, many of the units produced in June had minor molding defects. In order to maintain the department's normal high rate of completion, Wendy told Bart to pass through inspection and on to the Assembly Department all units that had defects nondetectable to the human eye. “Company and industry tolerances on this product are too high anyway,” says Wendy. "Less than 2% of the units we produce are subjected in the market to the stress tolerance we've designed into them. The odds of those 2% being any of this month's units are even less. Anyway, we're saving the company money.” Who are the potential stakeholders involved in this situation (who has a stake in what happens here)? What alternatives does Bart have in this situation? What might the company do to prevent this situation from occurring?

Answer 1

a) The Potential Stake holders involved in this situations are;

1.Wendy Soo - Department head in the Molding Department

2. Bart Fender - Quality Control Inspector

(Who has a stake in what happens here - Wendy Soo - Department head in the Molding Department)

b) The other alternative is reject to defective product releasing to market.

The Company can prevent this by hiring technically skilled employee.