Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work and should bear higher customer charges. The estimator sums up his position in this way: “My job is to measure the area to be cleared of asbestos. As directed by top management, I simply multiply the square footage by $2.50 to determine the bid price. Since our average cost is only $2.455 per square foot, that leaves enough cushion to take care of the additional costs of nonroutine work that shows up. Besides, it is difficult to know what is routine or not routine until you actually start tearing things apart.” To shed light on this controversy, the company initiated an activity-based costing study of all of its costs. Data from the activity-based costing system follow: Activity Cost Pool Activity Measure Total Activity Removing asbestos Thousands of square feet 1,000 thousand square feet Estimating and job setup Number of jobs 500 jobs Working on nonroutine jobs Number of nonroutine jobs 100 nonroutine jobs Other (organization-sustaining costs and idle capacity costs) None Note: The 100 nonroutine jobs are included in the total of 500 jobs. Both nonroutine jobs and routine jobs require estimating and setup. Costs for the Year Wages and salaries $ 407,000 Disposal fees 800,000 Equipment depreciation 96,000 On-site supplies 56,000 Office expenses 300,000 Licensing and insurance 490,000 Total cost $ 2,149,000 Distribution of Resource Consumption Across Activities Removing Asbestos Estimating and Job Setup Working on Nonroutine Jobs Other Total Wages and salaries 50 % 10 % 30 % 10 % 100 % Disposal fees 70 % 0 % 30 % 0 % 100 % Equipment depreciation 40 % 5 % 20 % 35 % 100 % On-site supplies 60 % 25 % 15 % 0 % 100 % Office expenses 15 % 35 % 20 % 30 % 100 % Licensing and insurance 25 % 0 % 60 % 15 % 100 % Required: 1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
| Removing asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Nonroutine Jobs | Other | Total | |
| Wages and salaries | |||||
| Disposal fees | |||||
| Equipment depreciation | |||||
| On-site supplies | |||||
| Office expenses | |||||
| Licensing and insurance | |||||
| Total cost |
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Rate | |
| Removing asbestos | per thousand square feet | |
| Estimating and job setup | per job | |
| Working on nonroutine jobs |
per nonroutine job |
|
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system. a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job. c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
| Routine 1,000 sq. ft. job | Routine 2,000 sq. ft. job | Nonroutine 2,000 sq. ft. job | |
| Total cost of the job | |||
| Average Cost per thousand square feet |
1. Perform the first-stage allocation of costs to the activity cost pools.
Answer:
| Removing Asbestos | Estimating and Job Setup | Working on Non-routine Jobs | Other | Total | |
| Wages and Salaries | 203,500 | 40,700 | 122,100 | 40,700 | 407,000 |
| Disposal fees | 560,000 | 0 | 240,000 | 0 | 800,000 |
| Equipment depreciation | 38,400 | 4,800 | 19,200 | 33,600 | 96,000 |
| On-site supplies | 33,600 | 14,000 | 8,400 | 0 | 56,000 |
| Office expenses | 45,000 | 105,000 | 60,000 | 90,000 | 300,000 |
| Licensing and Insurance | 122,500 | 0 | 294,000 | 73,500 | 490,000 |
| Total | 1,003,000 | 164,500 | 743,700 | 237,800 | 2,149,000 |
Calculation
Wages and
salaries:
Removing asbestos = 50% × $407,000= $203,500
Estimating and Job Setup = 10% × $407,000= $40,700
Working on Nonroutine Jobs = 30% × $407,000= $122,100
Other = 10% × $407,000= 40,700
Disposal
fees:
Removing asbestos = 70% × $800,000 = $560,000
Estimating and Job Setup = 0% × $800,000 = $0
Working on Nonroutine Jobs = 30% × $800,000 = $240,000
Other = 0% × $800,000 = $0
Equipment
depreciation:
Removing asbestos = 40% × $96,000 = $38,400
Estimating and Job Setup = 5% × $96,000 = $4,800
Working on Nonroutine Jobs = 20% × $96,000 = $19,200
Other = 35% × $96,000 = $33,600
On-site
supplies:
Removing asbestos = 60% × $56,000 = $33,600
Estimating and Job Setup = 25% × $56,000 = $14,000
Working on Nonroutine Jobs = 15% × $56,000 = $8,400
Other = 0% × $56,000 = $0
Office
expenses:
Removing asbestos = 15% × $300,000 = $45,000
Estimating and Job Setup = 35% × $300,000 = $105,000
Working on Nonroutine Jobs = 0% × $300,000 = $60,000
Other = 30% × $300,000 = $90,000
Licensing and
insurance:
Removing asbestos = 25% × $490,000 = $122,500
Estimating and Job Setup = 0% × $490,000 = $0
Working on Nonroutine Jobs = 60% × $490,000 = $294,000
Other = 15% × $490,000 = $73,500
2. Compute the activity rates for the activity cost pools.
Answer:
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Rate |
| Removing Asbestos | 1003 per thousand square foot |
| Estimating and Job Setup | 329 per job |
| Working on Nonroutine Jobs | 7,437 per non-routine job |
Calculation:
| Activity Cost Pool | Total Cost (a) | Activity Quantity (b) | Activity Rate (a)/(b) |
| Removing Asbestos | 1,003,000 | 1,000 square feet | 1003 per thousand square foot |
| Estimating and Job Setup | 164,500 | 500 jobs | 329 per job |
| Working on Nonroutine Jobs | 743,700 | 100 non-routine jobs | 7,437 per nonroutine job |
3. Using the activity rates you have computed, determine the total cost and the average cost per thousand square feet of each of the following jobs according to the activity-based costing system.
Answer:
| Routine 1,000 sq. ft. job | Routine 2,000 sq. ft. job | Nonroutine 2,000 sq. ft. job | |
| Total Cost of the job | 1,332.0 | 2,335.0 | 9,772.0 |
| Average Cost per thousand square feet | 1,332.0 | 1,167.5 | 4,886.0 |
Calculation:
a. A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Rate (a) | Activity Quantity (b) | Cost Allocated (a)*(b) |
| Removing Asbestos | 1003 per thousand square foot | 1 | 1,003 |
| Estimating and Job Setup | 329 per job | 1 | 329 |
| Working on Non-routine Jobs | 7,437 per non-routine job | 0 | 0 |
| Total Cost | 1,332 |
A routine 1,000-square-foot asbestos removal job will cost $1,332.
Average per thousand square feet is = 1,332/1 = 1,332
b. A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Rate (a) | Activity Quantity (b) | Cost Allocated (a)*(b) |
| Removing Asbestos | 1003 per thousand square foot | 2 | 2,006 |
| Estimating and Job Setup | 329 per job | 1 | 329 |
| Working on Non-routine Jobs | 7,437 per non-routine job | 0 | 0 |
| Total Cost | 2,335 |
A routine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job will cost $2,335.
Average per thousand square feet is = 2335/2 = 1,167.5
c. A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job.
| Activity Cost Pool | Activity Rate (a) | Activity Quantity (b) | Cost Allocated (a)*(b) |
| Removing Asbestos | 1003 per thousand square foot | 2 | 2,006 |
| Estimating and Job Setup | 329 per job | 1 | 329 |
| Working on Non-routine Jobs | 7,437 per non-routine job | 1 | 7,437 |
| Total Cost | 9,772 |
A nonroutine 2,000-square-foot asbestos removal job will cost $9,772
Average per thousand square feet is = 9,772/2 = 4,886.0
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company's estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company's estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company's estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic
asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has
been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and
the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the
estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such
as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older
homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated
ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors
believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine
work...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company's estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes and nonroutine work such as removing asbestos contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company's estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company's estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine...
1.34 points Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company's estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than...
Mercer Asbestos Removal Company removes potentially toxic asbestos insulation and related products from buildings. There has been a long-simmering dispute between the company’s estimator and the work supervisors. The on-site supervisors claim that the estimators do not adequately distinguish between routine work, such as removal of asbestos insulation around heating pipes in older homes, and nonroutine work, such as removing asbestos-contaminated ceiling plaster in industrial buildings. The on-site supervisors believe that nonroutine work is far more expensive than routine work...