Question

glo-bus.com Netflix (1) Facebook Google Session inactivity Time... http://help.joinhoney.com/ Getting Started SeeSanTV L y me Cover Lettere Checkout (thio) - eva.sunch... Presentation Walmart. The RO Simulation Quiz 2 < Previous Question 14 Next > Which one of the following is not usually an effective way to reduce production/assembly costs and/or marketing costs per action capture camera sold in an effort to achieve a sizable low- cost competitive advantage over rivals? Spending money on best practices/productivity improvement training for camera PATS Trying out numerous different combinations of components, product enhancements, and extra performance features to be used in action cameras in order to discover the lowest cost combination for achieving a competitively appealing P/Q rating Switching to robot-assisted assembly methods to lower depreciation costs at the production facility Paying PAT members an assembly quality incentive Investing in robot-assisted assembly methods to help lower labor costs per camera assembled 0 Copying, redistributing, or website posting is expressly prohibited and constitutes copyright violation Copyright 2019 by Glo-Bus Software, Inc. < Previous Next > Jo 2

Answer 1

Ans) Spending money on best practices/productivity improvement trainni for camera PATs is not an effective way to reduce production/assembly costs and/or marketing costs per action -capture Camera sold in an effort to achieve a sizable low cost competitive advantage because expense on best practices may not result in cost reduction in future they can increase cost of production in future and practices adopted by company may already can be followed by rival firm. All the other options will result in cost reduction in long term.