Question

A recently ruled upon US Supreme Court Case ... case summary (facts, issue, court's opinion, and etc)

The Topic must be about an employee using weed at the workplace

Answer 1

Summa case A recently ruled upon us Supreme Court al facts, issue, wort's ophim and cle) pic Employer using weed at the workplace ans - marijuana Facts & No law employers to accept obligates employers. line or impairment on the job. Even in shtes where marijuan tolerancs-Lenka legal nganizuhon may maintain zeno - policies and take appropriate action when an employee high while on duty What employers must evaluate are thein zero tolerance drug testing policies. That's because some sote and local lawr, along with recent court decisions mondoke accomodaholar por un In 14 states where medical marijuana is legal Arkansas Arizona, connecticut Delaware, Illinois, maine, Massachusete Minnesota, Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico New York Oklahoma, and Penny tvania lows expressly require that employers not discriminate against medical marijuana users. hmoine and Nevada, when bor medical and sucroalime put are legal lawmakers have taken it a step further there regulations says employers can't make adverse decisions about most worker's employment based on their marijuana use outside of the workplace. And in New York city, new lawr tackle the issue of a you candidates manifuana use and prohibit most me employment test for marijuana, Many states are not clear in addressing accomodations for current employers and jou seekers In 13 states, medical marijuana wae is legal that employers have no duty to allow it use Issue? Not long ago, a workplace drug screening that twined up marijuana ure was a tireable offense Al the federal level, marijuana is stiu illegal controlled substances All lish the due as a Schia controlled substance while the Americans with disah Act requires employers to make reasonable accom

for qualified worken with disablilies. Nossestag and using marijuana for any purpose is still a federal erine. regardless of state law. . But at the state level the path forward isn't so clear so for 34 states plun me district of Columbia have excercised theimisho who leqaure marijuana for medical reasons - A m ules evolve and you dichon-pon stronger powledom. por marijuana users, it depends. But whatever the decision the emerging laws and court rulings make it clean that organizohion must asseschow mey-apprach... their employus permissible pot use and make changes to their policies and processes b elay in compliance ----- L Court opinion - Prior to 2014, court rulings more often fell on side of the employer, but the legal landscape is evolvinge since then woh have been more likely to rule in favour of weed using employees in states mat expressly require employera.c.comodahon Nutable case laws includes - Delaware superior Colonti_2018_devuonn Chancer Kreft. Hein2_fouds.co... In this case thina job_lik_accident, Kraft tein2 fired an employce for foiling a drug test even Though he was...medical marijuana_card holde. The cocot. held that meanti..discriminahm.marisiim.Delaware medical majijuana law is not prompted by the federal Controlled substances. ActThis ruling could inform curt decisions in other stath going forward. It also should serve as a wornie for employer mat me argument that they can discrimindel against marijuana users simply because the drug is illloool of the federal level may be a losing proposition.. mamother case, Whitmine v Walmant dares, mean employee who won a medical marijuana user in Arizon book a drug test triggered by an on the job injure rested positive for pot. Though the screening hook noe two days after the injury, Walmart fired me enni claining that the best result indicated she was high a . L - me employee was high when

when she was injured during her shift. She sued Walmart, arguine that her terminanm.violaked.me Ancona.medibel Marijuana Aet --and won