| Stand Alone Method | Stand-alone cost-allocation method—determines the weights for cost | |||||||
| allocation by considering each user of the cost object as a separate entity to determine the cost-allocation weights. | ||||||||
| Cost | % of cost | |||||||
| Safari(Rwanda) | $1,200 | 60% | (1200/2000) | |||||
| Mukai(Nairobi) | $800 | 40% | (800/2000) | |||||
| $2,000 | ||||||||
| Combined Cost | $1,500 | |||||||
| Allocated to Safari | $900 | (1500*60%) | ||||||
| Allocated to Mukai | $600 | (1500*40%) | ||||||
| Increamental Cost apporach | Incremental cost-allocation method ranks the individual users of a cost object in the order of users most | |||||||
| responsible for a common cost and then uses this ranking to allocate the cost among the users. | ||||||||
| Cost | Cost | |||||||
| Safari(Rwanda) - Primary | $1,200 | Safari(Rwanda) - Increamental | $700 | (1500-800) | ||||
| Mukai(Nairobi) - increamental | $300 | (1500-1200) | Mukai(Nairobi) - Primary | $800 | ||||
| $1,500 | $1,500 | |||||||
| Shapley value method | ||||||||
| Safari(Rwanda) - Primary | (Cost allocated as primary user+cost allocated as increamental user)/2 | |||||||
| Mukai(Nairobi) - increamental | (Cost allocated as primary user+cost allocated as increamental user)/2 | |||||||
| Safari(Rwanda) - Primary | (1200+700)/2 | $950 | ||||||
| Mukai(Nairobi) - increamental | (300+800)/2 | $550 | ||||||
| $1,500 | ||||||||
* Please feel free to ask any doubt related to this topic in the comment section. Please give your valuable feedback.
b) Assume that you are living in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and your friend, Safari, in...
Read Blackgold case A Preview the document: CASE A: CASE A: Frankie “Between you and me, Ernest, my friend, I don’t think it will work. I have known the guy for 8 years. It is his, uh, lifestyle, you know. But hey, you make the call. It is your department. Just don’t come running to me later. . . when he screws up.” Raj Krishnamurthy stated, as he stole a glance at the next table. Ernest Cua was the Head...
Write down your analysis of this case on factors like the interests involved, context and power PACIFIC OIL COMPANY (A)* "Look, you asked for my advice, and I gave it to you," Frank Kelsey said. "If I were you, I wouldn't make any more concessions! I really don't think you ought to agree to their last demand! But you're the one who has to live with the contract, not me!" Static on the transatlantic telephone connection obscured Jean Fontaine's reply....
Write down your analysis of this case on factors like 1. the negotiation process, strategy and tactics PACIFIC OIL COMPANY (A)* "Look, you asked for my advice, and I gave it to you," Frank Kelsey said. "If I were you, I wouldn't make any more concessions! I really don't think you ought to agree to their last demand! But you're the one who has to live with the contract, not me!" Static on the transatlantic telephone connection obscured Jean Fontaine's...