The correct answer is A
Since both the parties were unaware of the value of truck, there was no intention of the other party to deceive the other person and hence it cannot be called as a fraud. So its not a defense to fraud and fraudulent misrepresentation as the intention to deceive the other person knowingly is missing.
The said case cannot be called as puffery as Luc didn't exaggerate the things but it unknowingly made the representation of facts.
So the correct answer is A
Do give your feedback! Happy learning :) :)
Question 1 5 pts Luc, a vehicle dealer, offers to sell May a truck and trailer,...
Question 14 (2 points) Saved While having lunch at a Wendy's restaurant, Karin offers Sebastian her priceless original Gauguin painting for $1 because "Sebastian is a good friend and always has been there for her. Karin, a notoriously bad speller, writes the following short agreement on the back of a heavily used yellow paper napkin using multicolored crayons: "I, Karin Miller, herebeye sel to my bestest friend and solemate, Sebastian Jones, my original Goguin peinting (called Summer at the Beech)...