Part (a)
Calculation of savings of surcharge for the year if proposed system is installed:
Surcharge per day = (200,000 litres/1000 litres * $ 4) = $ 800 per day
Cost for the year = $ 800 * 300 days = $ 240,000
Annual operating cost if the new system is installed =$ 150,000
Thus, Net savings from the installation of new system = 240,000 - 150,000
= $ 90,000
Calculation of NPV from the proposed system
| Year | Amount | PVF @ 26% | Present Value | |
| Initial Cost | 0 | -360,000 | 1 | -360,000 |
| Net savings | 1-12 | 90,000 | 3.6059 | 324,531 |
| Salvage Value | 12 | 40,000 | 0.0625 | 2,500 |
| NPV | -32969 |
Project's NPV is -$ 32,969.
Part (b)
IRR would be the discounting rate at which NPV = 0
Solving for IRR using scientific/financial calculator
CF0 = - 360,000
CF1-11 = 90,000
CF12 = 130,000
IRR: CPT = 23.1584%
Note: The same can also be done using trial & error method. The answer would still be the same
Part (c)
Payback period refers to the length of time required for an investment to recover its initial outlay in terms of profits or savings.
In the given case, the NPV of the proposed system is negative, i.e. the project is unable to recover it's initial outlay. Hence, the project will not have a payback period. This means that the company will not be able to recover it's initial outlay at a discounting rate of 26%.
Cost Reduction Proposal: IRR, NPV, and Payback Period JB Chemical currently discharges liquid waste into Calgary's...
Payback Period and IRR of a Cost Reduction Proposal-Differential Analysis A light-emitting diode (LED) is a semiconductor diode that emits narrow-spectrum light. Although relatively expensive when compared to incandescent bulbs, they use significantly less energy and last six to ten times longer, with a slow decline in performance rather than an abrupt failure. Metropolitan City currently has 80,000 incandescent bulbs in traffic lights at approximately 12,000 intersections. It is estimated that replacing all the incandescent bulbs with LED will cost...