Question

Sly Cases for Evaluation beliefs? What mora judgment? Should rei allow parents to do a long as the actions ar ations? If not, what should not be allowed eady on CASE I Faith-Healing Parents Arrested for Death of Second Child Ct A religious couple already on probation for choos- ing prayer over medicine in the death of their tod dler son may be facing similar charges in the death of their newest child. "They lost their 8-month-old son, Brandon, last week after he suffered from diar rhea and breathing problems for at least a week, and stopped eating. Four years ago, another son died from bacterial pneumonia." "Discovery.com, 24 April CASE 2 and State Paternali and Pregnant nurse b That boy, a two-year-old named Kent, died after (AP)-Public hospita the Schaibles refused to take him to the doctor when for drugs and turn th he became sick, relying instead on faith and prayer. consent, the Suprem rovider to physicians of compe ontroversy se parents rounds face when physician The couple were convicted of involuntary man- slaughter and sentenced to 10 years on probation. ruling that buttress against unreasonable In the latest tragedy, they told police that they Charlestonl] prayed for God to heal Brandon instead of taking Some women whe him to a doctor when he fell ill. Officials said that an South Carolina publ autopsy will be performed on the child, and de- their beds shortly af The justices ruled patients' consent vi The couple attend, and have taught at, Phila- though the goal was delphia's First Century Gospel Church, which ing their fetuses by u pending on those results the parents may be charged are about ith a crime. ess or in ular treat principle reatments stan cites Biblical scripture favoring prayer and faith ver modern medicine. Other religions, including Followers of Christ Church, Christian Scientists, and Scientology, have doctrines that prohibit or discourage modern medicine and therapeutic interventions. It's a very very ing the right to priva cilla Smith, lawyerf Law and Policy, whe lina women. "It r have that same righ with their doctors." his is not the first time that parents have gone on trial for child abuse or neglect for refusing their imize Justice John Paul children medical attention. Though freedom of reli- while the ultimate g gion is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the gram may have bee U.S. Constitution, the practice of that religion does not ment, "the immedia give followers license to break the law-especially to generate evidenc ti when the result is injury or death to a child.* in order to reach th

Answer 1

Yes,I agree with the court order to give 10 year probation for the parents .No,the punishment was not unpleasant because both parents are responsible for their children's death because,they didn't allow them to got treated .They should get imprisonment for what they did to their children.parents have the right to take decisions but it should not be harmfull for them. children didn't get their right to receive treatment on time due to their false beliefs.Moreover,no religious beliefs teach us to refuse the treatment for human being as he himself has created every thing for us.people have freedom to believe in any religion but no one permit  to do such negligence and break the law..No religious allow any one to do any thing with their children.In case of life of people ,parents should give Bette treatment for their children inorder to get cured.No one has the right to end the life of anyone even if it is in the name god or religion.such people should get imprisonement so that others will never do such mistakes.Both prayer and medicine are important to get rid of from all disease condition.so,parents should take initiative to consult with the doctor when they get sick while doing prayer.otherwise ,make them understand that it is an offense if they break the law as child abuse is not allowed by law and order of nation.