Question

In 2 - 3 paragraphs, explain the main question raised in "Justice and Lung Cancer", the conclusion that is reached, and how it is reached (what considerations are brought to bear on the question and support the conclusion?)

Answer 1

Lung cancer is the condition with the tumor like growth including lungs of the individual. It is a common type of cancer. Justice Ruther from US was diagnosed of lung cancer accidently while she got screened for her broken ribs. A nodule was diagnosed stating it as cancer at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. The two nodules were removed surgically.

This is known as sheer luck and pickup when the x-ray taken for some other cause indicates the life threatening diagnosis and saves life. This was not the first time she also got treated for a colon cancer and pancreatic tumor before and both of those also got diagnosed by chance.

it is seen that these cancers from colon and pancreas has some degree of metastasis but the lung nodules were not identified to be derivatives of these cancer for the justice. She has record of returning to work quickly but as of multiple processes she is on rest as orders by Supreme court. Hence, it is concluded that routine screening sometimes lead to identification of such hazards that can save the life of the individual.