After the affordable care act was passed into law, states debated on whether they should adopt the Medicaid expansion. Was a state’s decision to adopt the Medicaid expansion influenced by its majority party affiliation? To test this claim, the following data is available.
What criticism might you have of the data analysis? Researchers might take issue with the variables chosen, or the setup of this particular test. There are no wrong answers, here, but your reasoning should be supported by statistical theory or supporting evidence.
|
States |
Medicaid Expanded |
Medicaid Not Expanded |
|
Voted Democrat in 2012 presidential election |
22 |
4 |
|
Voted Republican in 2012 presidential election |
6 |
18 |
Given table data is as below
calculation formula for E table matrix
expected frequencies calculated by applying E - table matrix formula
calculate chisquare test statistic using given observed frequencies, calculated expected frequencies from above
set up null vs alternative as null, Ho: no relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are independent alternative, H1: exists a relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are dependent level of significance, α = 0.05 from standard normal table, chi square value at right tailed, ᴪ^2 α/2 =3.8415 since our test is right tailed,reject Ho when ᴪ^2 o > 3.8415 we use test statistic ᴪ^2 o = Σ(Oi-Ei)^2/Ei from the table , ᴪ^2 o = 18.0008 critical value the value of |ᴪ^2 α| at los 0.05 with d.f (r-1)(c-1)= ( 2 -1 ) * ( 2 - 1 ) = 1 * 1 = 1 is 3.8415 we got | ᴪ^2| =18.0008 & | ᴪ^2 α | =3.8415 make decision hence value of | ᴪ^2 o | > | ᴪ^2 α| and here we reject Ho ᴪ^2 p_value =0 ANSWERS --------------- null, Ho: no relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are independent alternative, H1: exists a relation b/w X and Y OR X and Y are dependent test statistic: 18.0008 critical value: 3.8415 p-value:0 decision: reject Ho |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
we have enough evidence to support the claim that state’s decision to adopt the Medicaid expansion influenced by its majority party affiliation.
After the affordable care act was passed into law, states debated on whether they should adopt...
After the affordable care act was passed into law, states debated on whether they should adopt the Medicaid expansion. Was a state’s decision to adopt the Medicaid expansion influenced by its majority party affiliation? To test this claim, the following data is available. After reviewing the data, respond to the following questions in this discussion forum: Conduct a chi-square test of independence for “States Voting for Barack Obama” and its effect on Medicaid Expansion. State a null and alternative hypothesis....
The administration of President Barack Obama has made Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often called “Obamacare”, its chief domestic accomplishment and the centerpiece of Obama’s legacy. Essential to Obama’s health care reform plan is Healthcare.gov, a health insurance exchange Web site that facilitates the sale of private health insurance plans to U.S. residents, assists people eligible to sign up for Medicaid, and has a separate marketplace for small businesses. The site allows users to compare prices on health insurance...