Question

Shaffer ordered a glass of rose wine at he Victoria Station Resturant. As he took his first sip of wine, the glass broke in his hand, causing permanent injuries. Shaffer brought suit against the restaurant for breach of warranty of merchantability. The restuarants position was that because it did not sell the wine glass to shaffer (only its contents), it was not a merchant with respect to the glass and therefore made no warranty. Do you agree with the resturant why or why not?

Answer 1

(ie) YOnt uhle hong his Pemanent injui ohs hond O0 en g rmund of boaeh of mevchantobilih 从a are not-the mar chant in Yapect t-lhe glesg Container and朮헝 had no uay1ody touards it -jexviCinq a aco, σΥ anywhere elle .lle dyoounds or else.cohere ard·t tenned a8 a Sle

2 to versel dould be. P-pex fr an ơrdiraag A,P9e.be tafo 已S ted fr the brach of mechontaby 6