a) IRR of the investment is when the NPV = 0. If we invest 75000 now in the equipment we will be saving 18500 per year that we dont need to pay for penalty.
| Year | CF | Discount Factor | Discounted CF | ||
| 0 | $ -75,000.00 | 1/(1+0.0742411377785078)^0= | 1 | 1*-75000= | -75,000.00 |
| 1 | $ 18,500.00 | 1/(1+0.0742411377785078)^1= | 0.93088969 | 0.930889690249588*18500= | 17,221.46 |
| 2 | $ 18,500.00 | 1/(1+0.0742411377785078)^2= | 0.866555615 | 0.866555615412974*18500= | 16,031.28 |
| 3 | $ 18,500.00 | 1/(1+0.0742411377785078)^3= | 0.806667688 | 0.806667688415824*18500= | 14,923.35 |
| 4 | $ 18,500.00 | 1/(1+0.0742411377785078)^4= | 0.750918635 | 0.750918634603758*18500= | 13,891.99 |
| 5 | $ 18,500.00 | 1/(1+0.0742411377785078)^5= | 0.699022415 | 0.699022415168936*18500= | 12,931.91 |
| NPV = Sum of all Discounted CF | 0.00 | ||||
b) Decision rule is that if IRR is greater than the MARR, then the project should be selected while if it is lower than the MARR then the project should not be selected
c) As the IRR is 7.42% and the MARR is % then the project should not be selected
flow diagram chart please 6. Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to...
Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA fines of $18,500 per year. An emission reduction filter will cost $75,000 and have an expected life of 5 years. Carlisle's MARR is 10%/yr. a. What is the internal rate of return of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on internal rate of return? c. Is the filter economically justified?
please dont use excel write down all the steps and
explanation
a. wna b. Wha basc c. Sho 6. Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA fines of $18,500 per year. An emission reduction filter will cost $75,000 and have an expected life of 5 years, Carlisle's MARR is 10%/yr. a. What is the internal rate of return of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the...
Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA fines of $14,500 per year. An emission reduction filter will cost $75,000 and will have an expected life of 5 years. Carlisle's MARR is 5 %/year. Click here to access the TVM Factor Table Calculator What is the present worth of this investment? $ Carry all interim calculations to 5 decimal places and then round your final answer to the nearest dollar. The...
2. CI has a poor record of compliance and they must invest in equipment to reduce hazardous waste emissions or face EPA fines of $20,500 per year (This is avoided cost if a Filter is purchased, thus a benefit). A Reduction filter will cost $72,500 and have an expected life of 6 years. CI's MARR (hurdle rate) is 11% Draw the cash flow diagram (7points) b. Solve for IRR of this investment (30 points) Hint: Start with double digit %'s....