Question

QUESTION 5 Match the element of the Torres-Lazarini v. United States with its descriptor Torres-Lazarini had a fall and his first x-ray showed no dae buta precursor to degenerative bone disease Ethics analysis 8. Legal analysis c Court's holding D Fact E Rule of Law C The court deemed the care Torres-Lazarini received after his fall to be an in compliance with the standards A deviation from the standard must be determined when determining negligent behavior has occurred E Patients have an obligation to adhere to a treatment plan prescribed by a provider B. B Torres-Lazarini failed to prove the VA commited malpractice

Legal Ethics of healthcare class. match each one with corresponding based on the Torres-Lazarini v United states case

Answer 1

Fact refers to the actual state or result of an action

Ans.Torres-Lazarini who had a fall and underwent X Ray revealed degenerative disease due to osteoporosis, The provider has ordered an anti-inflammatory but he refused.

The courts holding and decisions is based non the written law

Ans.The court deemed the care Torrez-Lazarini received after his fall to be in compliance with the standards.

Rule of law state that any person or subject or an organization is responsible for their act in front of the law. So the law analyses both the end

Ans. A deviation from the standard must be determined when determining negligent behaviour has occurred

Ethical analysis  refers to the right or wrong .In simple word when a decision to be made it will be in a dilemma. In which both the end result may be better ,choosing one among them is difficult. It entirely depend on an individual

Ans.Patients have an obligationsto ad here to a treatment plan prescribed by a provider

Legal analysis refers to the decision made by the court or law .This generally punishes or sues a person or organization for their mistakes

Ans.Torrez-Lazarini failed to prove that the VA committed malpractice