Question

C. On September 21, 1971, an infant was born with severe combined immunodeficiency dis- ease (SCID). The family and physicians involved, knowing that the baby had an even chance of having the fatal illness, had the child delivered by cesarean section and then sealed in a plastic chamber. Frequent newspaper reports on "David the bubble boy" continued through the years, as he was moved to larger and larger chambers. The absolute devo- tion of his family, coupled with approximately $200,000 per year in research grants from the National Institutes of Health, and extraordinary and imaginative technology, allowed David to remain free from contact with organisms and to celebrate his twelfth birthday. After attempted treatment of bone marrow previously treated using monoclonal antibodies, David died on February 22, 1984.2 If David were born next week instead of in 1971, do you think that we should begin the ever-more-demanding bubble process? Whatever your answer, defend it using some rational ethical criteria.

Answer 1

David's disease condition was something which affected the immune system directly due to change occured in the X Chromosome of his gene.It affects the lymphocytes namely T cells and B cells which protects an individual from infection.Even a mild infection can be fatal in SCID.There were two option during his period a stem cell therapy which was found to be a cure but no match was found for him and the other being bubble therapy to prevent infection Even if David was born a week later and suffers SCID, he will be in need of bubble therapy to survive.