Again, suppose we have a relation on attributes A, B, C, D, E, and F, and these functional dependencies hold: S = { B → DE, BF → C, CF → B, DF → AE }.
(a) Does it follow from S that B → A?
(b) Does it follow from S that CF → E?
(c) Does it follow from S that DF → B?
(d) Does it follow from S that BD → C?
(e) Does it follow from S that BF C → A?


Again, suppose we have a relation on attributes A, B, C, D, E, and F, and...
Consider the following relation: R(A,B,C,D,E) The following set of functional dependencies are ture on the relation R: FD: AB -> E, E -> D, AD -> C Which of the following sets of attributes does not functionally determine C? AC ABE BD AE AB
Consider the relation R with attributes: A, B, C, D, E, and F Let S be a set of functional dependencies in R such that S = { A-> B, CD-> E, C-> D]. Which of these attributes are in the closure of [C, F)?
We have the attributes: {A, B, C, D, E, F, G}. Consider the following functional dependencies F → C, D E → B B, D, G → C G → B, D B, G → D, E F → E B, E → A, F F, G → C, D The minimal keys are: {G} Determine whether these functional dependencies are in the following normal form(s): Third Normal form or Boyce Codd normal form
We have the attributes: {A, B, C, D, E, F, G}. Consider the following functional dependencies E, F → C E → F B → A, G A, E, F → C, G D → A C, D, F → B, E, G A → B B, E → D, G Mark all functional dependencies that are implied by the dependencies above: a). D,F --> E, F b). D,F --> A,F c) D,F --> A d) D,F -->G e) D,F...
Here's a relation (R), its attributes and its functional dependencies (F): R(A, B, C, D, E) C D → B A → D D → C E → C What is the closure of AB ({AB}+)? What is the closure of F (F+)? [ set of closures for all LHS][each LHS on one line] What is the minimal set (cover) for F? Provide a key for relation R (a minimal set of attributes that can determine all attr.) Decompose the...
We now have relational scheme R = {A, B, C, D, E, F, G } and the following functional dependencies: D → AC GA → C E → A GD → BF GD → E And the Following MVDs: C→→ A F →→ B GB →→ C Asking: Is this relation in the 4NF? Why? If it is not in 4NF, transform it into 4NF.
Consider a relation R with five attributes A, B, C, D, and E. You are given the following functional dependencies: A → B, BC→E, and ED→A. (a) Is R in BCNF? If it is not, decompose it into a collection of BCNF relations. 2: BCNF and 3NF (3 points) Consider the relation schema R with attributes A, B, C, and D and the following functional dependencies: AB→C, AC→B, B→D, BC→A. (a) Is R in BCNF? If it is not, decompose...
Consider a relation schema R with attributes ABCDEFGH with functional dependencies S: S={B→CD, BF→H, C→AG, CEH→F, CH→B} Employ the BCNF decomposition algorithm to obtain a lossless decomposition of R into a collection of relations that are in BCNF. Make sure it is clear which relations are in the final decomposition and project the dependencies onto each relation in that final decomposition.
Question 1: Functional Dependencies [7 marks Consider a relation R on attributes (A, B, C, D, E, F,G, H) and the following functional dependen- cies. B →G C →D DE →GC → EF DEF → H (a) What is the closure of [F, G, Hy? (b) List all of the candidate keys of R under the dependencies above. (c) List all of the FDs above that are 3NF violations (d) List all of the FDs above that are BCNF violations....
(1) Find a minimal cover for the relation... (a) R = (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H) with the set F = {A →B, ABCD→E, EF→GH, ACDF→EG} of functional dependencies. Show each step. (b) R = (A, B, C, D, E) with the set F = {A→BC, CD→E, B→D, E→A} of functional dependencies. Show each step. (c) R = (A, B, C, D, E, F) with the set F = {A → D, AC → DE, B →...