Question

Write 3 Paragraphs For Your Response: analysis your discussion to bring depth for your discussion Fallsview Glatt Kosher Caterers ran a business that provided travel packages, including food, entertain- ment, and lectures on religious subjects, to customers during the Passover holiday at a New York resort. Willie Rosen- feld verbally agreed to pay Fallsview $24,050 for the Passover package for himself and his family. Rosenfeld did not appear at the resort and never paid the money owed. Fallsview sued Rosen- feld for breach of contract. Rosenfeld claimed that the contract was unenforceable because it was not in writing and violated the UCC's Statute of Frauds. Is the contract valid? Explain.

Answer 1

IMPORTANT READ*****HOMEWORKLIB RULES - This explanation is not your answer. Anything you submit must be of your own work. We are here to provide explanation and directions ONLY. Hope you understand! If you like my explanation, give this answer thumbs up by showing your support. Thank you*****

Here, the Fallsview Glatt Kosher Caterers runs a company that provides customers during Passover holidays at a New York resort with packages including food, entertainment and seminars on religious subjects.Willie Rosenfeld called Fallsview Glatt Kosher Caterers and decided orally to pay himself and fifteen of his relatives $24.050 for their passover kit.Yet Willie Rosenfeld and his family never appeared at the resort and never paid the amount owed to him. Willie Rosenfeld eventually filed a dismissal case. Rosenfeld argued that the contract was unsuccessful because it was not drafted in breach of the UCC's Fraud Statute.

The question is the contract true in this case? The Fraud Statute is a selling and leasing clause. Such requirements include the formal enforceability of selling contracts for products priced at or above $500 and lease contracts requiring full payments of or above $1,000.

Nevertheless, the UCC defines three exceptions to the written requirements of the Fraud Statute. An oral goods sales contract of $500 or better shall be enforceable despite the absence of written form in the case of the leased goods of $1,000 or more. The products shall be specially manufactured for a certain purchaser, or particularly made, or purchased for a certain leased owner, and the goods may not be resold or rented for others, in the ordinary course of business.

In this situation, I assume that this is a valid contract since it is a contractual agreement for more than $500, not for the sale of goods. Fallsview Kosher Caterers has run a business which offers packages for business tourism, including food, entertainment and lectures on religious matters during the holidays in Passover. This kit was provided with goods, services and admission to partial results by the Rosenfelds specially produced. The goods and services were produced specifically for a certain buyer not suitable for resale. Fallsview offered more goods than services, Rosenfeld stated.

This case might also be subject to the parol proof rule, since it proves beyond the contract that the parties are proof of previous negotiations, prior agreement or contemporary oral agreements. If a contract is established with all the terms and conditions agreed between the two parties, this is intended to be a complete and fully integrated declaration of agreement. Rosenfeld explained the days that he and his family were going to take part and offered him a head number of fifteen.Therefore, it is an enforceable contract.

If you need any further information or explanation let me know.Ill surely help you.Please please rate the answer.It really helps me.Thanks!