FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments
Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments.
The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December:
| Units to account for: | ||
| Units, beginning work in process | 4,000 | (40% complete) |
| Units started | ? | |
| Total units to account for | ? | |
| Units accounted for: | ||
| Units, ending work in process | 8,000 | (50% complete) |
| Units completed | ? | |
| Units accounted for | ? |
Costs in beginning work in process for the Polishing Department were direct materials, $5,000; conversion costs, $6,000; and transferred in, $8,000. Costs added during the month: direct materials, $32,000; conversion costs, $50,000; and transferred in, $40,000.
Assume the company uses the FIFO method.
Required:
1-a. Prepare a schedule of equivalent units. Enter percentages as whole numbers.
| Direct Materials | Conversion Costs | Transferred In | |
| Units to complete in BWIP: | |||
|
x % |
|||
| Units in EWIP: | |||
|
x % |
|||
|
x % |
|||
1-b. Compute the unit cost for the month of
December. Round intermediate calculations and your final answer to
the nearest cent.
$ per equivalent unit
| Units to account for: | ||
| Units, beginning work in process | 4000 | (40% complete) |
| Units started | 20000 | |
| Total units to account for | 24000 | |
| Units accounted for: | ||
| Units, ending work in process | 8000 | (50% complete) |
| Units completed | 16000 | |
| Units accounted for | 24000 |
1-a.
| Fordman Company | |||
| Schedule of Equivalent Units | |||
| For the month of December | |||
| Direct Materials | Conversion Costs | Transferred In | |
| Units started and completed | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 |
| Units to complete in BWIP: | |||
| 4000 x 60% | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Units in EWIP: | |||
| 8000 x 50% | 4000 | 4000 | |
| 8000 x 100% | 8000 | ||
| Total equivalent units | 18400 | 18400 | 20000 |
1-b. $6.46 per equivalent unit
| Direct Materials | Conversion Costs | Transferred In | Total | |
| Costs added during December | 32000 | 50000 | 40000 | |
| Equivalent units | 18400 | 18400 | 20000 | |
| Cost per equivalent unit $ | 1.74 | 2.72 | 2.00 | 6.46 |
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through...
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for: Units,...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Problem 2 Watson Company has a polishing. During October.th polishing department. The cost $40.000. Direct materials are upany has a product that passes through two processes: grinding and uring October, the grinding department transferred 20.000 units to the 9 department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was measured the same way in both departments Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process Units are econd department (polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for The...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple DepartmentsFordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments.The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December:Units to account for: Units, beginning work in...
Cost Information and FIFO Gunnison Company had the following equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December: Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units started and completed 40,000 40,000 Add: Units in beginning work in process × Percentage complete: 5,000 × 0% direct materials — 5,000 × 50% conversion Costs 2,500 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 12,000 × 100% direct materials 12,000 — 12,000 × 35% conversion Costs — 4,200...
Cost Information and FIFO Gunnison Company had the following equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December: Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units started and completed 49,000 49,000 Add: Units in beginning work in process × Percentage complete: 6,000 × 0% direct materials — 6,000 × 50% conversion Costs 3,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 10,000 × 100% direct materials 10,000 — 10,000 × 35% conversion Costs —...
Cost Information and FIFO Gunnison Company had the following equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December: Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units started and completed 49,000 49,000 Add: Units in beginning work in process × Percentage complete: 6,000 × 0% direct materials — 6,000 × 50% conversion Costs 3,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 10,000 × 100% direct materials 10,000 — 10,000 × 35% conversion Costs —...
Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 40,000 40,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 10,000 × 100% direct materials 10,000 — 10,000 × 40% conversion materials — 4,000 Eqivalent units of output 50,000 44,000 Costs: Work in process, December 1: Direct materials $62,000 Conversion costs 12,000 Total...