In your first month as a junior
engineer in a structural engineering consulting company, you were
asked by your supervisor to check a design calculation that was
previously completed by a senior engineer. The beam in question is
part of a floor system, simply supported, and subjected to an
ultimate positive moment, Mu, of 835 kip.ft. In the current design,
the beam is 14 in x 30 in and has 6 #10 rebars as the tension
reinforcement as well as 2 #9 rebars as the compression
reinforcement. After you analyzed the capacity of the beam, you
found that the nominal moment, Mn, of the beam is 849 kip.ft and
the net tensile strain, εt, is 0.00442. The senior engineer must
have forgotten to apply the strength reduction factor! According to
the canons in NSPE and ASCE Codes of Ethics, what should you do in
this case? Cite the appropriate canon(s). Then, what can you
recommend to fix this problem if the beam dimensions can no longer
be changed due to architectural and other requirements? Provide the
rationale
In your first month as a junior engineer in a structural engineering consulting company, you were...