You know a chemistry major. She knows all about protons,
neutrons, and electrons, and she sees them in action every day in
the laboratory. However, she is skeptical when you tell her about
positrons, muons, neutrinos, pions, quarks, and bosons. Explain to
her why none of these plays any direct role in chemistry. (For
instance, in the case of a muon a reasonable answer might be “They
are unstable and last only a millionth of a second before
disintegrating”.)
1-positrons -they are the antiparticle of electron having same opposite charge as electron. they can be only be produced by positron emission decay or by pair production so it is not easy to analyze them in daily life.
2-muons-they are partice having charge and spin same as electron but mass greater than electron and last fot about 2.2micro seconds
3-neutrinos- they are produced when cosmic rays strike earth
4-pions -they are partice made of quarks and anti quarks and annhilate very quicki when comes to vicinity of the identical particle
5-QUARKS-they are the basic component of matter and form proton and neuton by combining
6-BOSONS:-they are the fundamental particles which include photons gluons etc
SO ABOVE DISSCUSSIONS IT CLEAR THAT THE ABOVE PARTICLE ARE NOT EASY TO OBTAIN
You know a chemistry major. She knows all about protons, neutrons, and electrons, and she sees...