(A) 2 independent sample t test
because population SD not provided.
(B)
H0: Nul Hypothesis:
HA: Alternative Hypothesis:
(C)
(i)
t score = 1.0405
ndf = 151.606
Two Tail Test
By Technology, P - Value = 0.2998
So,
P - Value = 0.2998
(ii)
Since P - Value = 0.2998 is greater than = 0.10, the
difference is not significant. Fail to reject null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
The data do not support the claim that there is difference between
average GPA of Varsity & Club athletes and the average GPA of
Intramural & Non- athletes.
(D)
Since the conclusion is : Fail to reject null hypothesis, Type II Error: Failure to reject a false null hypothesis could be made.
Explanation:
Suppose in reality there is difference between average GPA of
Varsity & Club athletes and the average GPA of Intramural &
Non- athletes.But, we wrongly conclude that there is no significant
difference between average GPA of Varsity & Club athletes and
the average GPA of Intramural & Non- athletes. Type II Error is
committed in this situation.
4. Claire, Tian and Chris, another three committee members who are interested in students' academic success,...
Future Time Orientation and Condom Use for AIDS
Prevention
Background Notes: Researchers administered questionnaires to
male college students taking an introductory psychology course.
Among other things, they measured future time orientation defined
as planning ahead for future events and willingness to delay
gratification. (Sample item: “I believe that a person’s day should
be planned ahead.”) Based on the scores on the future time
orientation scale, they split the male students into two groups –
one low in future orientation and...