HomeworkLib
Question

In NFIB v. Sebelius, the United States Supreme Court upheld Obamacare as constitutional exercise of the...

In NFIB v. Sebelius, the United States Supreme Court upheld Obamacare as constitutional exercise of the power of Congress to make law. In a lengthy dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia laid out the case for why the Court got it wrong. Who was right: Roberts or Scalia? Why? Explain.

Social-Sciences   psychology   
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Next > < Previous
Sort answers by oldest

Homework Answers

Answer #1

I think Robert was right in decision on affordable care acts as healthcare is basic necessities for people and a law passed by Congress should only be judicially reviewed if there is violation of constitutional provision . However , Scalia opposition is more based on technical grounds that law mentions state only while judgement mentions exchange by state. Moreover issue over subsidising 87% population has also been opposed. But these are natter to be enquired by executives and not prerogative of judiciary.

0 0
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In NFIB v. Sebelius, the United States Supreme Court upheld Obamacare as constitutional exercise of the...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions

  • Assignment Complete the Critical Legal Thinking Questions Critical Legal Thinking Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United...

    Assignment Complete the Critical Legal Thinking Questions Critical Legal Thinking Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States "One need only examine the evidence which we have discussed... to see that Congress may ... prohibit racial discrimination by motels serving travelers, however local their operations may appear." ---Clark, Justice The Heart of Atlanta Motel, located in the state of Georgia, had 216 rooms available to guests. The motel was readily accessible to motorists using U.S. interstate highways 75 and 85 and...

  • The Supreme Court decision in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson (1894) codified the idea that...

    The Supreme Court decision in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson (1894) codified the idea that racial segregation could be permitted under the constitutional requirement of equal protection under the law if the segregated facilities, schools, public spaces, and so forth were equal. “Separate but equal” then became the legal basis for the racist, segregated Jim Crow system that existed in the United States into the 1960s. a) True b) False

  • Question 26 (3.5 points) A case that works its way through a state court system can...

    Question 26 (3.5 points) A case that works its way through a state court system can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court if... a) the President of the United States orders the Supreme Court to issue a writ of certiorari. b) the Congress orders the Supreme Court to issue a writ of certiorari. c) a state supreme court orders the Supreme Court to issue a writ of certiorari. d) there is a question of federal constitutional law involved in...

  • QUESTION 15 Kiel ener a o mab O a the United States Supreme Court O b...

    QUESTION 15 Kiel ener a o mab O a the United States Supreme Court O b federal district courts O c federal courts of appeals. Od state trial courts QUESTION 16 from being sold in the U S. The Calfornia state legislature enacts a law lowing the sale of Russian muade Congress enacts a law prochibiting do O a the national spending power. O b the commercally practicable enterprise dause dolls California's law will most likely be struck down under...

  • Briefly explain why the U.S. supreme court decision Hoke Vs. United States (decided in 1913) was...

    Briefly explain why the U.S. supreme court decision Hoke Vs. United States (decided in 1913) was important to the study of criminal law.?

  • Based on Justice Breyer's explanation, how does the Supreme Court help insure that they will hear...

    Based on Justice Breyer's explanation, how does the Supreme Court help insure that they will hear dissenting views from each other? They deliberately ask each other to imagine dissenting opinions They ask for opinions from EVERYONE, even people who are not familiar with the relevant law or case. They rely on dissent from the opposing counsels who argue before the court They require everyone to speak once - and explain their initial views - before anyone is permitted to speak...

  • In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton argued that the judiciary was the least dangerous branch of...

    In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton argued that the judiciary was the least dangerous branch of government. Many people would argue that Hamilton was incorrect and that today's courts wield an enormous amount of power. However, Hamilton believed the courts were the least dangerous branch because they had the power of neither the purse nor the sword. The courts' power increased with John Marshall's establishment of judicial review. All presidents are concerned with the legacy they leave once out of...

  • In Direct Sales Co. v. United States,[i] discussed in the Lauria case, the conviction of a...

    In Direct Sales Co. v. United States,[i] discussed in the Lauria case, the conviction of a wholesale drug company for conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws by selling large quantities of drugs to a physician who was supplying addicts was upheld by the Supreme Court. The Lauria court distinguished Direct Sales case from United States v. Falcone,[ii] in which the sellers of large quantities of sugar, yeast, and cans were absolved from participation in a moonshining conspiracy. What do you...

  • Since the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair, States may pass legislation...

    Since the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair, States may pass legislation which requires business to collect Sales Tax from customers even though no Sales Tax Nexus would otherwise exisit.

  • Case analysis: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004) United States Supreme Court please list four...

    Case analysis: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004) United States Supreme Court please list four alternative courses of action which would have helped the client not get into the "problem. with evaluation.

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT