Solution:
First we have to find the roots of each equation by applying x1=0 & x2=0.
Consider x1 + x2 =6 as equation1 and x1 + 2.5x2 =10 as equation 2.
In the below attachement, we can find the roots of the equation.

![table for finding maximum value. Here apply the feasible region [OC GB] points to max z, we get points value then a maximum v](http://img.homeworklib.com/questions/99130760-dff7-11ea-ae02-cb4e779720cd.png?x-oss-process=image/resize,w_560)
Therefore the optimum solution is max z = 6c1; for all the values of -∞ ≤c1≤∞ Since x1 = 6, x2 = 0
2. Consider the following linear model where C1 has not yet been defined. Max s.t. z...
2. Consider the following linear model where c has not yet been defined. Max z = C1x1 + x2 s.t. X1 + X2 <6 X1 + 2.5x2 < 10 X1 2 0,X220 Use the graphical approach that we covered to find the optimal solution, x*=(x,x) for all values of - Sci so Hint: First draw the feasible region and notice that there are only a few corner points that can be the optimal solution. Also remember that if the objective...
2. Consider the following linear model where c has not yet been defined. Max z = C1x1 + x2 s.t. X1 + X2 <6 X1 + 2.5x2 < 10 X1 2 0,X220 Use the graphical approach that we covered to find the optimal solution, x*=(x,x) for all values of - Sci so Hint: First draw the feasible region and notice that there are only a few corner points that can be the optimal solution. Also remember that if the objective...
Consider the following linear program Max 3xl +2x2 S.t 1x1 + 1x2 〈 10 3x1 1x2 〈 24 1xl t 2x2< 16 And xl, x2> 0. a) Use Excel Solver to find the optimal solution to this problem. State the optimal values of xl, x2, and Z. b) Assume that the objective function coefficient for xl changes from 3 to 5. Does the optimal solution change? c) Assume that the objective function coefficient for x1 remains 3, but the objective...
alim Universitesi LMS adi Consider the following linear programming model Maximize z = 3x1 + 2 X2 s.t. Xi 54 X1 + 3x2 = 15 2X1 + X2S TO X 30 X220. Calculate the value of the objective function for each of the corner-point (extreme point) solutions. Use this information to identify the optimal solution. Fill the table below with your answers. Extreme-point (x1.x2) Objective Value feasible Z solutions
Solve the following linear programming problems as directed. Put in a box the values of all the variables you use in your solution, as well as the optimal value of the objective function. a) SIMPLEX METHOD Max Z = 11X1 + 10X2 s.t. 2 X1 + X2 <= 150 4 X1 + 3 X2 <= 200 X1 + 6 X2 <= 175 X1, X2 >= 0 b) GRAPHIC METHOD (do not forget to indicate the feasible region) Min Z = 30...
Consider the following linear programming model: Max X1 + X2 Subject to: X1 + X2 ≤ 2 X1 ≥ 1 X2 ≥ 3 X1, X2 ≥ 0 This linear programming model has a(n). A. Unbound solution B. Infeasible solution C. Redundant constraint D. Alternate optimal solution
Consider the following linear programming model Max 2X1 + 3X2 Subject to: X1 + X2 X1 ≥ 2 X1, X2 ≥ 0 This linear programming model has: A. Infeasible solution B. Unique solution C. Unbounded Solution D. Alternate optimal solution E. Redundant constraints
Consider the following linear program: Max Z = X1 – 2X2 Subject to – 4X1 + 3X2 <= 3 X1 – X2 <= 3 X1, X2 >= 0 a) Graph the feasible region for the problem. b) Is the feasible region unbounded? Explain. c) Find the optimal solution. d) Does an unbounded feasible region imply that the optimal solution to the linear program will be unbounded?
Consider the following linear program: Max 2X + 3Y s.t. 5X +5Y ≤ 400 -1X+ 1Y ≥ 10 1X + 3Y ≥ 90 X, Y ≥ 0 a. Use the graphical solution procedure to find the optimal solution. b. Conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine the range of optimality for the objective function coefficients X & Y. c. What are the binding constraints? d. If the right-hand-side of the binding constraints are marginally increased, what will be the Dual Value?
Use the following Management Scientist output to answer the questions. LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM MAX 31X1+35X2+32X3 S.T. 3X1+5X2+2X3>90 6X1+7X2+8X3<150 5X1+3X2+3X3<120 OPTIMAL SOLUTION Objective Function Value = 763.333 Variable Value Reduced Cost X1 13.333 0.000 X2 10.000 0.000 X3 0.000 10.889 Constraint Slack/Surplus Dual Price 1 0.000 0.778 2 0.000 5.556 3 23.333 0.000 OBJECTIVE COEFFICIENT RANGES Variable Lower Limit Current Value Upper Limit X1 30.000 31.000 No Upper Limit X2 No Lower Limit 35.000 36.167 X3 No Lower Limit 32.000 42.889...