8.) Consider the integers Z. Dene the relation on Z by x y if
and only
if 7j(y + 6x). Prove:
a.) The relation is an equivalence relation.
b.) Find the equivalence class of 0 and prove that it is a subgroup
of Z
with the usual addition operator on the integers.

![6 The o le co] sub group of Z. equivalence class of o OJ = 7867 1.0 onas = {REZI 7/1} = 77 o We now prove that give 77 is a H](http://img.homeworklib.com/questions/84652f40-dffa-11ea-b807-5b7fdca3aa75.png?x-oss-process=image/resize,w_560)
8.) Consider the integers Z. Dene the relation on Z by x y if and only...
5. On the set of integers Z define the following relation: "aRb if and only if a - b is a multiple of 7." (1) Prove that R is an equivalence relation. 16 Marks] How many elements are there in the quotient set of 2 with respect to the equivalence relation R? Give reasons. |4 Marks
(6 pts) Alternate construction of the integers from the natural numbers. Suppose that the natural numbers N = {0,1,2, ...} ations. We do not yet have a notion of subtraction or the cancellation law for addition (if x+y = x+ z, then y = 2) and for multiplication given with the usual addition and multiplication oper negative numbers, though we do have are Define a relation R on N2 as follows (a, b) R (c, d) if and only if...
4. Consider the relation on the positive integers xRy if and only if x x+y (a) List three ordered pairs from this relationship (b) Is R reflexive? Prove your answer (c) Is R symmetric? Prove your answer (d) Is R anti-symmetric? Prove your answer (e) Is R transitive? Prove your answer.
Define the set F- (XI X is a finite set of counting numbers) and the relation is a finiice sei of counting nuobors and the relation {(X Z〉 | Ye F and Z € Fand y-2). This relation is just a version of the usual subset relation, but restricted to only apply to the sets in F Prove: CFis a partial order. Prove: Cis not symmetric and connected. Prove: If R is an equivalence relation, it is also a euclidean...
Problem 5. Define a relation ~on R x R as (x, y) ~(a,b) if and only if either x-a or y- b. Prove or disproof, isan equivalence relation? If so, write down all the equivalence classes.
(e) Define a relation R on Z as xRy if and only if m|(x - y). Prove that R is an equiv- alence relation.
2. Consider the relation E on Z defined by E n, m) n+ m is even} equivalence relation (a) Prove that E is an (b) Let n E Z. Find [n]. equivalence relation in [N, the equivalence class of 3. We defined a relation on sets A B. Prove that this relation is an (In this view, countable sets the natural numbers under this equivalence relation). exactly those that are are
2. Consider the relation E on Z defined by...
16. (8 points) Let Z be the integers and let A - Zx Z. Define the relation R on A by (a, b) R(c, d) if and only if a c and b 3 d for all (a, b), (c, d)E A. Prove that R is a partial ordering on A that is not a total ordering.
16. (8 points) Let Z be the integers and let A - Zx Z. Define the relation R on A by (a, b)...
Problem 11.16. Let X = {XE Ζ+ : x-100): that is, X is the set of all integers from l to 100. For each Y E 9(X) we define AY (2 E 9(X) : Y and Z have the same number of elements) (a) Prove that AY : Y є 9(X)} partitions 9(X). (b) Letdenote the equivalence relation on (X) that is associated with this partition (according to Theorem 11.4). If possible, find A, B, and C such that 1....
Define an equivalence relation on R by (x,y,z) ∼ (u,v,w) whenever x +y +z = u +v +w . Describe the equivalence classes.