100,750
(Income with redistributive plan = 115,000 - 14,250 = 100,750)
39,250
(Poornima's income = 14,250 + 25,000 = 39,250)
145,000; 140,000; decreases
(Without plan, income = 115,000 + 30,000 = 145,000; With plan,
income = 100,750 + 39,250 = 140,000)
should
The plan benefits Poornima, who is the least well off member of
society.
(As Poornima's income increases, so, according to maximin
criterion, it should be implemented.)
Homework (Ch 20) 4. Redistributive philosophies and incentives Consider a society consisting of two people. Manuel...
4. Redistributive philosophies and Incentives Consider a society consisting of two people. Sam eams an income of $120,000 per year and Teresa earns an income of $35,000 per year. The government is considering a redistribution plan that would impose a 15% tax on Sam's Income and give the revenue to Teresa. without any Incentive distortion, Sam would retain $102,000 and Teresa would end up with $53,000. However, let us assume that since Sam will not receive all the income he...
2. Redistributive philosophies and incentives Consider a society comprised of two people. Carlos earns an income of $100,000 per year and Deborah earns an income of $30,000 per year. The redistribution plan that would impose a 25% tax on Carlos's income and give the revenue to Deborah government is considering Without any incentive distortion, Carlos would retain $75,000 and Deborah would end up with $55,000. However, let us assume that since Carlos will not receive all the income he earns,...
FISCAL POLICY IN THEORY: March, 2020: we are on the verge of Congress and the President passing legislation that will empower the federal government to spend an unprecedented amount of EXTRA money not seen since World War 2 ---- in order to address the pandemic but also to help cushion the blow financially of perhaps ten or twenty million Americans --- or more --- losing their jobs, and thus suffering a drop in income. The scale of the 2020 recession...