Please don't use schwarz pick lemma![5.17. Suppose f : D[0,1] → D[0,1] is holomorphic. Prove that for z1 <1, 1 |f(2) 1 - 12](http://img.homeworklib.com/questions/6c9512a0-ef0c-11ea-abff-896c01a49ce5.png?x-oss-process=image/resize,w_560)
![and f is holomorphic f: 200, 1] Pro, 1] =) |f(?) (212 1 =) okr. 1-131 B- $ Camely integral ( formula let Zo E D of (2) dz tre](http://img.homeworklib.com/questions/6d379e00-ef0c-11ea-b7f0-a3b5cd5f0e2c.png?x-oss-process=image/resize,w_560)
Please don't use schwarz pick lemma 5.17. Suppose f : D[0,1] → D[0,1] is holomorphic. Prove...
help with thus problem but not using schwoz-pick lemma
[3] 5. Suppose that f: D[0,1] → D[0,1] is holomorphic, prove that f'(x) < 1/(1 - 1-1) for all z € D[0, 1]
[3] 5. Suppose that f: D[0,1] for all z E D[0, 1] D[0,1] is holomorphic, prove that \f'(z) < 1/(1 - 121)2
(3) 5. Suppose that f : D[0, 1] → D[0, 1] is holomorphic, prove that f'(2) < 1/(1 - 121) for all z e D[0,1].
[3] 5. Suppose that f: D[0, 1] → D[0, 1] is holomorphic, prove that \f'(x) < 1/(1 - 1z| for all z e D[0, 1]. [3] 5. Suppose that f: D[0, 1] → D[0, 1] is holomorphic, prove that f'(x) < 1/(1-1-12 for all z e D[0, 1]
[3] 5. Suppose that f: D[0,1] for all z E D(0,1) D[0,1] is holomorphic, prove that f'() 5 1/(1 - 121)?
2 Suppose that f(x, y) = - and the region D is given by {(x, y) |1<<3,3 <y < 6}. y D Q Then the double integral of f(x, y) over D is S1,612,)dady
Exercise 3 Let f be an analytic function on D(0,1). Suppose that f(z) < 1 for all z € C and f() = 0. Show that G) . (Hint: use the function g(z) = f(2).)
Suppose that f(x, y) = 1 on the domain D = {(x, y) – 5 < x < 3, -5 <y <3}. D a Then the double integral of f(x, y) over D is 1 dædy
2. (10 points) Use the pumping lemma for context free grammars
to show the following languages are not context-free.
(a) (5 points)
.
(b) (5 points)
L = {w ◦ Reverse(w) ◦ w | w ∈ {0,1}∗}.
I free grammar for this language L. lemma for context free grammars to show t 1. {OʻPOT<)} L = {w • Reverse(w) w we {0,1}*). DA+hattha follaurino lano
Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to prove that
L3 is not a CFL.
L3 = { w: w e{a,b,c}* and na(w) < nh(w) < nc(w) }.