Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
Set difference operation refers to the operation which includes the first operation but should not perform the second operation.
Suppose there are 2 regular languages A and B.
The DFA for A be :

The DFA for B be :

There are m states in A and n states in B. Then, the cross product will have m*n states.
The cross product construction takes place as follows :
The transition in the resultant DFA of the A - B will be :
If in the first DFA, state Si on seeing symbol p goes to state Sj and in the second DFA, state Tk on seeing symbol p goes to state Th.
Then in the new DFA of set differenece, the state [ Si Tk ] on seeing symbol p goes to state [ Sj Th ].
The initial state will be the state comprising the initial state of first and second DFA that is state [ S1 T1 ].
As per definition of set difference, the regular language A - B will accept those strings which are part of A but not B. Then, in the resultant DFA, the final state will be [ Sm Tq ] where Tq is any non final state of the second DFA.
Since, in the resultant DFA, the states are defined using the cross product of the 2 DFAs, the initial state, final state and the transition function is also defined and the alphabet input remains the same, the resultant language is a regular language.
Hence, using a cross-product construction it can be proved that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference.
Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference....
Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
2. (15) Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under intersection. That is, show that if ? and ? are regular languages, then ? ∩ ? = {? | ? ∈ ? ??? ? ∈ ?} is also regular. Hint:givenaDFA? =(?,Σ,?,?,?)thatrecognizes?andaDFA? =(?,Σ,?,?,?)that11111 22222 recognizes ?, construct a new DFA ? = (?, Σ, ?, ?0, ?) that recognizes ? ∩ ? and justify why your construction is correct.
Automata Prove that regular languages are closed under difference, using an indirect proof (leveraging the closure of other set operators).
(20 pt.) Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under reverse. That is, show that if ? is a regular language, then ?? = {?? | ? ∈ ?} is also regular. Hint: given a DFA ? = (?, Σ, ?, ?0, ?) that recognizes ?, construct a new NFA ? = (?′, Σ, ?′, ?0′, ?′)that recognizes ?? and justify why your construction is correct.
(20 pt.) Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under reverse. That is, show that if A is a regular language, then AR = {wR WE A} is also regular. Hint: given a DFA M = (Q,2,8,90, F) that recognizes A, construct a new NFA N = (Q', 2,8', qo',F') that recognizes AR and justify why your construction is correct.
5. (20 pt.) Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under reverse. That is, show that if A is a regular language, then AR = {wR W E A} is also regular. Hint: given a DFA M = (Q,2,8,90, F) that recognizes A, construct a new NFA N = (Q', 2,8', qo',F') that recognizes AR and justify why your construction is correct.
Show that the class of context-free languages is closed under the regular operation union. For simplicity, you may assume that the alphabets of G1 and G2 are the same. [Hint: Use a constructive proof. Start with the formal definitions, G1 = (V1 ,∑, R1,S1) and G2 = (V2, ∑, R2, S2) and derive the formal definition of G∪.]
Show that the class of context-free languages is not closed under difference. Use either of the following facts: a. The class of context-free languages is not closed under intersection. b. The language {ww | w ∈ {a,b}*} is not a CFL.
Problem 3 [20 points Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under reverse. That is, show that if A is a regular language, then AR -[wR | w e A is also regular. [Hint: given a DFA M = (Q,Σ, δ, q0,F) that recognizes A, construct a new NFA (Q', Σ,8,6, F') that recognizes AR.]