Suppose PDC is optimistic about the potential for the luxury high-rise condominium complex and that this optimism leads to an initial subjective probability assessment of 0.81 that demand will be strong (S1) and a corresponding probability of 0.19 that demand will be weak (S2). Assume the decision alternative to build the large condominium complex was found to be optimal using the expected value approach. Also, a sensitivity analysis was conducted for the payoffs associated with this decision alternative. It was found that the large complex remained optimal as long as the payoff for the strong demand was greater than or equal to $16.58 million and as long as the payoff for the weak demand was greater than or equal to -$17.32 million.

Solution:
Given
| State of Nature | ||
| Decision Alternative | Strong Demand S1 | Weak Demand S2 |
| Small complex, d1 | 9 | 8 |
| Medium complex, d2 | 14 | 4 |
| Large complex, d3 | 19 | -7 |
Expected Monetary value (EMV):
|
State of Nature |
|||
|
Decision Alternative |
Strong Demand S1 |
Weak Demand S2 |
EMV |
|
Small complex, d1 |
9 |
8 |
(0.81)(9)+(0.19)(8) = 8.81 |
|
Medium complex, d2 |
14 |
4 |
Decision alternative d3 will remain the optimal
decision alternative as long as EV(d2) is less than or
equal to the expected value of the optimal decision
alternative,
EV(d2) <= $14.06M
Let
S = the payoff of decision alternative d2 when demand is
strong
W = the payoff of decision alternative d2 when demand is
weak
Then
EV(d2) = 0.81 x S + 0.19 x W
b) Assume the payoff under weak demand, W = $4M
EV(d2) = 0.81 x S + 0.19 x ($4M) <= $14.06M
0.8 x S + $0.76M <= $14.06M
0.8 x S <= $14.06M - $0.76M
0.8 x S <= 13.30M
S <= 16.42M
The payoff for the medium complex under strong demand remains less than or equal to $16.42 million, the large complex remains the best decision.
For Small Complex Decision
Decision alternative d3 will remain the optimal
decision alternative as long as EV(d1) is less than or
equal to the expected value of the optimal decision
alternative,
EV(d1) <= $14.06M
Let
S = the payoff of decision alternative d1 when demand is
strong
W = the payoff of decision alternative d1 when demand is
weak
Then
EV(d2) = 0.81 x S + 0.19 x W
Assume the payoff under weak demand, W = $8M
EV(d2) = 0.81 x S + 0.19 x ($8M) <= $14.06M
0.8 x S + $1.52M <= $14.06M
0.8 x S <= $14.06M - $1.52M
0.8 x S <= 12.54M
S <= 15.48M
The payoff for the Small complex under strong demand remains less than or equal to $15.48 million, the large complex remains the best decision.
Please give upvote.
Thank you.
Suppose PDC is optimistic about the potential for the luxury high-rise condominium complex and that this...
State of Nature Decision Alternative Strong Demand S1 Weak Demand S2 Small complex, d1 7 5 Medium complex, d2 14 6 Large complex, d3 20 -8 Suppose PDC is optimistic about the potential for the luxury high-rise condominium complex and that this optimism leads to an initial subjective probability assessment of 0.8 that demand will be strong (S1) and a corresponding probability of 0.2 that demand will be weak (S2). Assume the decision alternative to build the large condominium complex...
IIf you cannot read it just transcribe the
image.
Following is the payoff table for the Pittsburgh Development Corporation (PDC) Condominium Project. Amounts are in millions of dollars. State of Nature Strong Demand Si Weak Demand S2 Decision Alternative Small complex, di 7 6 Medium complex, d2 15 3 Large complex, dz 23 -7 Suppose PDC is optimistic about the potential for the luxury high-rise condominium complex and that this optimism leads to an initial subjective probability assessment of 0.78...
1.Given is a decision payoff table. Future Demand Alternatives Low Moderate High Small Facility 53 31 22 Medium Facility 29 42 32 Large Facility -5 30 53 a) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMAX is to select facility b) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMIN is to select facility c) The best decision under uncertainty using LAPLACE/EQUALITY LIKELY is to select facility d) If the probabilities for Future Demand when it is Low = 0.35, Moderate = 0.30,...
Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...
Read about Cokes strategy in Africa in the article below and discuss the ethics of selling soft drinks to very poor people. Is this an issue that a company like Coke should consider? Africa: Coke's Last Frontier Sales are flat in developed countries. For Coke to keep growing, Africa is it By Duane Stanford Piles of trash are burning outside the Mamakamau Shop in Uthiru, a suburb of Nairobi, Kenya. Sewage trickles by in an open trench. Across the street,...
What should Ajanta do about its recent order from SF?
AJANTA PACKAGING: KEY ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT Sandeep Puri and Rakesh Singh wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to iustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized, or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the...
Write down your analysis of this case on factors like 1. the negotiation process, strategy and tactics PACIFIC OIL COMPANY (A)* "Look, you asked for my advice, and I gave it to you," Frank Kelsey said. "If I were you, I wouldn't make any more concessions! I really don't think you ought to agree to their last demand! But you're the one who has to live with the contract, not me!" Static on the transatlantic telephone connection obscured Jean Fontaine's...
Write down your analysis of this case on factors like the interests involved, context and power PACIFIC OIL COMPANY (A)* "Look, you asked for my advice, and I gave it to you," Frank Kelsey said. "If I were you, I wouldn't make any more concessions! I really don't think you ought to agree to their last demand! But you're the one who has to live with the contract, not me!" Static on the transatlantic telephone connection obscured Jean Fontaine's reply....
SYNOPSIS The product manager for coffee development at Kraft Canada must decide whether to introduce the company's new line of single-serve coffee pods or to await results from the product's launch in the United States. Key strategic decisions include choosing the target market to focus on and determining the value proposition to emphasize. Important questions are also raised in regard to how the new product should be branded, the flavors to offer, whether Kraft should use traditional distribution channels or...
I need Summary of this Paper i dont need long summary i need
What methodology they used , what is the purpose of this paper and
some conclusions and contributes of this paper. I need this for my
Finishing Project so i need this ASAP please ( IN 1-2-3 HOURS
PLEASE !!!)
Budgetary Policy and Economic Growth Errol D'Souza The share of capital expenditures in government expenditures has been slipping and the tax reforms have not yet improved the income...