Can someone please help solve this, its econ with stats

Answer (14):
When you omit a expalnatory variable which is correlated with the dependnet variable, you commit a problem of ommision of relevant variables. Suppose the true model is:
Y = B1 + B2X2 + B3X3 + u
But you estimate the below model instead:
Y = A1 + A2X2 + u
Here you ommited X3, thus omitting a relevant variable.
The consequences of this is that the estimators will be biased i.e.
E(a1) = A1 ≠ B1 and E(a2) = A2 ≠ B2
Thus, the correct answer is the coefficients of the included variables will always be biased.
Answer (15):
The hypothesis for jarque bera test is:
H0: The residuals are normal
H1: The residuals are not normal
The test statistic for Jarque Bera test is:
JB = (n/6) * [S2 + (K-3)2/4 ]
where, n = sample size = 60
S = skewness = 0.5
K-3 = excess kurtosis = 1
So, JB = (60/6) * [0.52 + (1)2/4] = 10 * [0.25 + 0.25] = 5
This distribution follows chi-square distribution with 2 degrees of freedom.
At 5% level of significance, chi-square = 5.99
As JB(=5) < 5.99, we cannot Reject H0 at % level of significance.
Thus, the answers are 5 and cannot.
Can someone please help solve this, its econ with stats Question 14 3 pts Suppose that...
Question 14 3 pts Suppose that you estimate a multiple regression model, but that you inadvertently omit an explanatory variable that is correlated with the dependent variable. In this case, the coefficients on the included variables will always be biased. the coefficients on the included variables will always be unbiased, but the standard errors and test statistics will be biased. there is no effect on the coefficients of the included variables since the omitted variable has been omitted. the coefficients...
Question 13 3 pts Consider three data series, each a random sample of seven observations (n = 7): Series 1: {1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 5, 5} Series 2: {1, 1, 3, 3, 3, 5, 5} Series 3: {1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 5} The interquartile range of Series 3 is: 4 0 3 2 Question 14 3 pts Suppose that you estimate a multiple regression model, but that you inadvertently omit an explanatory variable that is correlated with...
Question 14 3 pts Suppose that you estimate a multiple regression model, but that you inadvertently omit an explanatory variable that is correlated with the dependent variable. In this case, the coefficients on the included variables will always be unbiased, but the standard errors and test statistics will be biased. there is no effect on the coefficients of the included variables since the omitted variable has been omitted. the coefficients on the included variables will always be biased. the coefficients...
Suppose that you estimate a multiple regression model, but that you inadvertently omit an explanatory variable that is correlated with the dependent variable. In this case, the coefficients on the included variables will always be unbiased, but the standard errors and test statistics will be biased. the coefficients on the included variables will always be biased. there is no effect on the coefficients of the included variables since the omitted variable has been omitted. the coefficients on the included variables...
Question 15 3 pts Suppose that you estimate a multiple regression model using OLS using a sample of 120 observations. The skewness of the residuals is 0.5 and the excess kurtosis is 1. As a result, the value of the Jarque-Bera test is __and we reject the null hypothesis of normally distributed disturbances at the 5-percent level of significance. 5; cannot O 10; cannot 10; can 5; cannot
Question 15 3 pts Suppose that you estimate a multiple regression model using OLS using a sample of 120 observations. The skewness of the residuals is 0.5 and the excess kurtosis is 1. As a result, the value of the Jarque-Bera test is __and we reject the null hypothesis of normally distributed disturbances at the 5-percent level of significance. O 5; cannot O 10; can 5; cannot 10: cannot Question 16 3 pts
Suppose that you estimate a multiple regression model using OLS using a sample of 60 observations. The skewness of the residuals is 0.5 and the excess kurtosis is 1. As a result, the value of the Jarque-Bera test is _______ and we ______ reject the null hypothesis of normally distributed disturbances at the 5-percent level of significance. 10; cannot 10; can 5; cannot 5; cannot
Imagine that you regressed the earnings of individuals on a constant, a binary variable (“Male”) which takes on the value of 1 for males and is 0 otherwise, and another binary variable (“Female”) which takes on the value of 1 for female and is 0 otherwise. Because females typically earn less than males, you would expect: Group of answer choices autocorrelation or serial correlation to be a serious problem. the estimated coefficient for Male to have a positive sign, and...
Question 8 3 pts Suppose you estimate a multiple regression model using OLS and the coefficient of determination is very high (above 0.8), while none of the estimated coefficients are (individually) statistically different from zero at the 5-percent level of significance. The most likely reason for this result is: O multicollinearity. omitted variable bias. O serial correlation. spurious regression. 3 pts Question 9
Question 8 3 pts Suppose you estimate a multiple regression model using OLS and the coefficient of determination is very high (above 0.8), while none of the estimated coefficients are (individually) statistically different from zero at the 5-percent level of significance. The most likely reason for this result is: omitted variable bias. o serial correlation. spurious regression. o multicollinearity.