Recently Sea Eagle Ltd experienced a strike that affected a number of its operating plants. The group accountant of Sea Eagle Ltd indicated that it was not appropriate to report depreciation expense during this period as the equipment was not used during the strike. She stated that during the strike the equipment did not depreciate and an inappropriate matching of costs and revenues would result if depreciation were charged. She based her position on the following points.
Required
assets.
The relevant portion for this case from AASB 116 reads as :
“Therefore, depreciation does not cease when the asset becomes idle or is retired from active use unless the asset is fully depreciated. However, under usage methods of depreciation the depreciation charge can be zero while there is depreciation”
Depreciation is the means of allocation of cost of asset over number of accounting periods. It does not measure movement in fair value or use of property, plant and equipment unless a special method of depreciation i.e. based on usage is applied. Depreciation continues to be levied. It does not stop if asset gets idle or retired from the active use. Depreciation shall be charged till the asset is fully depreciated. This does not happen under the case of usage method of depreciation. Under usage method, if assets are not used for particular accounting period, the total depreciation shall be NIL in such scenario. Hence as per AASB 116, the usage would impact the estimation of useful life. The strike period if long enough may change the expected useful life of property, plant and equipment. This would impact expected residual value as well. If method of depreciation is determined, the factors for measurement will be affected by the economic events, in the present case, being strikes. The strike does not suspend depreciation allocation process as depreciation is not based on accounting principle of matching. Hence, depreciation is not to be matched with revenues in a particular accounting period.
Recently Sea Eagle Ltd experienced a strike that affected a number of its operating plants. The...
Question Three You are a senior accountant at ABC LTD. While proof-reading financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2017, Luiza, a trainee accountant, has Identified certain changes from last year's financial statements but she is unsure whether they represent a change in accounting policy, a revision in accounting estimate or a correction of prior-period error. Identify whether the following constitute a change in accounting policy, a revision in accounting estimate or a correction of prior-period error. a) Previously,...