Two portfolios on the capital market line have the same slope but different standard deviation.
The Capital allocation line equation is given by

Here,
is the slope of the CML and is same for both the portfolios
Lets us consider a case of 2-portfolio on a CML with different
portfolio standard deviation
is the expected return on the risky-part of the portfolio
is the risk-free rate = 2%
is the standard deviation on risky-part of the portfolio = 0.4
is the standard deviation of portfolio 1 = 0.2
is the standard deviation of portfolio 2 = 0.25
We use excel, to get different expected return on the portfolios
and
using the risk-free rate and standard deviations mentioned
| E(Rp1) | 0.02+0.2*((E(Ra)-0.02)/0.4) |
| E(Rp2) | 0.02+0.25*((E(Ra)-0.02)/0.4) |
| E(Ra) | E(Rp1) | E(Rp2) |
| 1% | 1.500% | 1.37500% |
| 2% | 2.000% | 2.00000% |
| 3% | 2.500% | 2.62500% |
| 4% | 3.000% | 3.25000% |
| 5% | 3.500% | 3.87500% |
| 6% | 4.000% | 4.50000% |
| 7% | 4.500% | 5.12500% |
| 8% | 5.000% | 5.75000% |
| 9% | 5.500% | 6.37500% |
| 10% | 6.000% | 7.00000% |
| 11% | 6.500% | 7.62500% |
| 12% | 7.000% | 8.25000% |
| 13% | 7.500% | 8.87500% |
| 14% | 8.000% | 9.50000% |
| 15% | 8.500% | 10.12500% |
| 16% | 9.000% | 10.75000% |
| 17% | 9.500% | 11.37500% |
| 18% | 10.000% | 12.00000% |
| 19% | 10.500% | 12.62500% |
| 20% | 11.000% | 13.25000% |
| 21% | 11.500% | 13.87500% |
| 22% | 12.000% | 14.50000% |
| 23% | 12.500% | 15.12500% |
| 24% | 13.000% | 15.75000% |
| 25% | 13.500% | 16.37500% |
| 26% | 14.000% | 17.00000% |
| 27% | 14.500% | 17.62500% |
| 28% | 15.000% | 18.25000% |
| 29% | 15.500% | 18.87500% |
| 30% | 16.000% | 19.50000% |
| 31% | 16.500% | 20.12500% |
| 32% | 17.000% | 20.75000% |
| 33% | 17.500% | 21.37500% |
| 34% | 18.000% | 22.00000% |
| 35% | 18.500% | 22.62500% |
| 36% | 19.000% | 23.25000% |
| 37% | 19.500% | 23.87500% |
| 38% | 20.000% | 24.50000% |
| 39% | 20.500% | 25.12500% |
| 40% | 21.000% | 25.75000% |
| 41% | 21.500% | 26.37500% |
| 42% | 22.000% | 27.00000% |
| 43% | 22.500% | 27.62500% |
| 44% | 23.000% | 28.25000% |
| 45% | 23.500% | 28.87500% |
Now, we calculated the correlation for both these portfolios using excel => Data => Data Analysis => Correlation

We get the correlation matrix as
| E(Rp1) | E(Rp2) | |
| E(Rp1) | 1 | |
| E(Rp2) | 1 | 1 |
Since, the correlation between the portfolios is 1, we observe that the two portfolios (on the CML) are perfectly correlated.
EXERCISE 2 Show that two portfolios on the capital allocation line are perfectly correlated EXERCISE 3
5. Consider two perfectly negatively correlated risky securities A and B. Your portfolio is currently weighted with 50% in A and 50% in B. A has an expected rate of return of 10% and a standard deviation of 16%. B has an expected rate of return of 8% and a standard deviation of 12%. The risk-free rate is 3%. (a) (3 points) What are the variance and return for your portfolio? (b) (4 points) What weights would give you the...
Two stocks, A and B, are perfectly negatively correlated. The variance of the stocks A and B are .3 and .4 respectively. What proportion should you invest in A to minimize the risk of your portfolio?
If any two assets are perfectly negatively correlated, an equal weighted portfolio of these two assets will result in a Portfolio return of zero [TRUE:FALSE]
Q15. Portfolio Choice (5 Points) In a two-assets allocation problem, what's the portfolio volatility if the return correlation between asset 1 and asset 2 is -1 (perfectly negatively correlated), 0 or 1 (perfectly positively correlated)? Q16. Describe some of the ways the CAPM is applied in practice (5 Points)
1 The Correlated trait exercise shows that. A) when two characters are correlated, selection always favors larger values of both or smaller values of both B) When two characters are correlated, one of them can evolve toward higher values even if smaller values are better for survival C) when two characters are correlated, selection is always strong on both or weak on both D) when two characters are correlated, the optimal values and selection strengths rise and fall together 2...
Consider two perfectly negatively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate of return of 16% and a standard deviation of return of 20%. B has an expected rate of return of 10% and a standard deviation of return of 30%. The weight of security B in the minimum-variance portfolio is? Please show all work.
1. Perfectly ________ correlated series move exactly together and have a correlation coefficient of ________, while perfectly ________ correlated series move exactly in opposite directions and have a correlation coefficient of ________. A. negatively; -1; positively; +1 B. negatively; +1; positively; -1 C. positively; -1; negatively; +1 D. positively; +1; negatively; -1 2. If two assets having perfectly negatively correlated returns are combined in a portfolio, then some combination of those two assets will ________. A. have more risk than...
I need help with this capital allocation exercise. Please help.
Only the literal c. It is a continuous exercise, for that I have to
post all the literals for better understanding
Allocation of capital between the risky asset and the risk-free asset. For the next section, geneate a table in Excel to obtain its results for the possible combinations of complete portfolios. The table can help you answer all the questions that follow. Generate this table with intervals of 0.05...
4. Mathematically show how the variance of a two-asset portfolio changes if the two assets are (i) perfectly positively correlated (+1), (ii) perfectly negatively correlated (-1), (iii) are normally correlated (between-1 and +1). Show your steps. (Total 50 Marks)
33. Consider two perfectly negatively correlated risky securities, A and B. Security A has an expected rate of return of 16% and a standard deviation of return of 20% Bhas an expected rate of return of 10% and a standard deviation of return of 30% The weight of security B in the minimum-variance portfolio is A 10% B 20% C 40% D. 60%