Question

SECTION 1: TRUE/FALSE, CHOOSE YOUR ANSWER BY CIRCLING 1. 2. In negligence, the tour elements of negligenoe that need to be proved by a plaintif are 3. In all defamation of character cases, one of the elements that the Plaintiff must prove is that the 4. A party can be liable for defamation for truthful statements if the statement hurts the plainei's 5. Tort law is concerned with compensation to a person who has suffered personal injury andior 6. The tort of slander is concerned with injury to a person's reputation or good name caused by talse Persons found to have committed a tort usually must pay a fine or serve time in jail. considered "essential" elements because any two are required in order to prove negligence. defendant knew that the statement was faise reputation suffered loss or damages to their property or reputation. statements that are mainly spoken. respass to land occurs only if the trespasser in some way interferes with the owner's actual simultaneous use of the land 8. Truth and privilege are defenses to defamation and if these defenses are proved by the defendant, then the defendant cannot be held responsible for defamation. 9. A breach of the duty 10. A landowner owes a duty of ordinary care even to trespassers. 11. Strict liability is or means "liability without regard to fault 12. For strict liability, plaintiff must show that defendant intended to infict injury on plainof 13. In negligence, the test to measure defendant's conduct is the reasonable person standardhest of care in negligence can consist of an act or a failure to act which ask what would a reasonably careful person do or not do under same or similar circumstances. 14. The reasonably careful person in negligence law is the most careful person in society 15. Proximate cause limits the responsibility of a wrongdoer in negligence law by providing that a wrongdoer is legally responsible only for direct, closely connected, continuous sequence of events between the negligent conduct and the injury to plaintiff, and the foreseeable consequences of his or her wrongful conduct. 16. The reasonable person standard is a subjective standard and the wrongdoers subjective intent does matter when considering the issue of negligence. Thus, if the person truly did not mean to be careless that lets him or her "off the hook for liability to the person harmedtF 17. In negligence, an intervening cause is a cause that interrupts the chain of events caused by original wrongdoer's conduct and has the legal effect of eliminating the liability of the original wrongdoer. 18. If the defendant has a physical handicap, then the reasonable person for the reasonable person standard will be considered to have the same handicap. 19. In a pure comparative negligence State, Plaintiff will receive money damages no matter how much he or she was at fault or contributed to his or her injury, but the amount of the award given to the plaintiff by the jury is reduced by that percentage assessed against plaintf

Answer 1

oved by plain till are Conldond emental alkmant becaune ma lto) an liabla .for c the Ghtarnord hurk-he paint//久.refulator. 5 lort law x Contarne cauert by..plre çktornontメ yhat are mainly S or good nama h fahe. n ho an aut or Ans Trua