Question

Ronald Hochberg is the President and sole Director and sole Shareholder of Diamond Auto Body &...

Ronald Hochberg is the President and sole Director and sole Shareholder of Diamond Auto Body & Repair, Inc., an Illinois corporation. Hochberg ordered and received auto parts form Hoskins Chevrolet. Hochberg paid all of the invoices from a checking account under the name of Diamond Auto Construction. Hoskins continued to send invoices to Diamond Auto Construction, until they accumulated to $40,000.00. When Hochberg was sued for the $40,000.00, he argued that he was not personally liable for the invoices, because the parts were ordered for Diamond Auto Body & Repair, Inc., and that he was only acting as an officer of the corporation. He testified that the corporation was doing business under the assumed name of Diamond Auto Construction. The evidence at trial showed that neither Hochberg nor Diamond Auto Body & Repair, Inc., had registered the assumed name with the Secretary of State as required by statute, nor otherwise indicated to Hoskins that they were dealing with a corporation.

Question (TRUE OR FALSE):

Ronald Hochberg is not personally liable for the debt, even though he failed to notify Hoskins that they were dealing with a corporation.

Subject: Business Law

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

False

In this case Diamond Auto construction is an assumed company, not registered. Records shows that Hochberg dealt Hoskins under assumed name called Diamond Auto Construction not a registered name.

So according to Illinois law, corporates can take assumed name if they are registered. Otherwise it make personally liable to the debts.

Here Hochberg is personally liable to pay the amount.

Please rate my answer.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Ronald Hochberg is the President and sole Director and sole Shareholder of Diamond Auto Body &...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • d. Neither Wanamaker nor Anderson is liable on the contract since the seller was obli. pated...

    d. Neither Wanamaker nor Anderson is liable on the contract since the seller was obli. pated to ascertain Anderson's authority. has the right to regain possession of tomobile and to collect damages. Brian may sue and collect from either Rob- Inson or Ambrose Il Amorost must pay in damages, he will be entitled to Indemnification from Robin son. Ambron notllable for the wrongful Teposion of the wtomobile since he was obeying the direct order of Robinson 22. Under which of...

  • QUESTION 1 Manuela has worked as an accountant in her own accounting business, a sole proprietorship,...

    QUESTION 1 Manuela has worked as an accountant in her own accounting business, a sole proprietorship, for more than seven years. Among the services she offers is tax return filing and personal investment advising. Which of the following is true of Manuela’s business? A. Manuela has little control over the management and operations of her business. B. Manuela has unlimited liability. C. Outside funding for the business has been easy for Manuela to obtain. D. Manuela had varied and complicated...

  • TRUE OR FALSE/ MULTIPLE CHOICE and word response questions. C. a more permanent government involvement in the ba...

    TRUE OR FALSE/ MULTIPLE CHOICE and word response questions. C. a more permanent government involvement in the banking system, even creating a pational banking system that owns and operates most of the global and regional banks. Deshort-term increases in government spending to stimulate the economy. 20. When describing the state of the U.S. economy, reporters often refer to the nation's GDP, its unemployment rate, and the CPI. Explain what each of these terms means and why each measure is significant....

  • Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are...

    Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...

  • Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring...

    Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring Twenties, the schemes and scams of flimflam artists and confidence men were legendary. The absence of a strong regulatory system at the federal level to police the securities markets—the Securities and Exchange Commission was not established until 1934—aided, if not encouraged, financial frauds of all types. In all likelihood, the majority of individuals involved in business during the 1920s were scrupulously honest. Nevertheless, the...

  • Read the following case: Answer the questions accordingly: PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE EEOC v. Management...

    Read the following case: Answer the questions accordingly: PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine 666 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2012) OPINION BY DISTRICT JUDGE YOUNG: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") brought this action on behalf of two serv- ers, Katrina Shisler and Michelle Powell, who were em- ployed at an International House of Pancakes franchise in Racine, Wisconsin (the "Racine IHOP"), alleging that the servers were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of...

  • Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine...

    Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine and how it was used to determine the year of inclusion in taxable income. How does the constructive receipt doctrine impact a cash-basis individual’s taxable income? What factors could have resulted in a different determination? 47 T.C. 428 (1967) PAUL V. HORNUNG, PETITIONER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Docket No. 3740-64. United States Tax Court. Filed January 27, 1967. 429*429 Michael J. Clare,...

  • Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine...

    Read the following Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428 (1967), which involves the constructive receipt doctrine and how it was used to determine the year of inclusion in taxable income and answer both question. How does the constructive receipt doctrine impact a cash-basis individual’s taxable income? What factors could have resulted in a different determination? 47 T.C. 428 (1967) PAUL V. HORNUNG, PETITIONER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Docket No. 3740-64. United States Tax Court. Filed January 27, 1967....

  • Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been...

    Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....

  • Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming...

    Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT