Question

fact Ua01 wroclavello them that the h at were not curameng inayofthey oftast bodove through orders . Does the c ar to be t able A Foto There is sufficient evidence lo warrant of them that the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to 10% OB. Fal to reject There is not sufficient evidence to wra c tion of the claim that the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to 10% OC Re There is suficientevidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the rate of incre ders is equal to 10% OD Rejes . There is no Montevidence to warrant rection of them at the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to 10% Does the rear be accepte O A Since there is no nevidence to reject the cam that the rate of inaccurate anders is equal to 10%, the restaurant should work to higher that rate So there w e re the cam e to 10%, the inaccuracy rate is not the should work to lower that rate OC. Since there were the cameras to the acceso Directem e nt so u rces on this would be to

Answer 1

soluton:- Given a = 33, in= 385, 9001 385 Test Hypothesisi Ho: p=0.1 vis H: P40:1 2= Papo L' j Pocheo 0.085-01 Po(IPO) 5-0.9810 -0.9810 Jolxona Ollxo.9 385 1 2=-0.9810 J p values At Z=-0.9810, using a table , two tail \ p value = 0.3265) decision:- P value =0.32 657 0.05, we fail to reject to Toption B is geight anwa. Bi fail to reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence loption A is right awwal. is not is not sufficient sufficient evidence to reject the claring there since that sot the . The rat of resturant inaccurate ordas should work to is eareal to higher the fate