How to prove that the satisfiability problem with each clause containing at most 3 literals, denoted by <= 3SAT, is NP-complete.
I've tried to prove it for several minutes but I can't make sure if it is equivalent to the max-3-SAT problem? This problem seems similar to the proof of SAT ∝ 3-SAT except for the case where there are more than 3 literals in each clause. so, we could prove that a clause with more than 3 literals could be broken into several 3-SAT.
for example,
x1
& x2 ∨ x3
& x4 ∨ x5 ∨ x6
& x7 ∨ x8 ∨ x9 ∨ x10 ∨ x11
This is a typical SAT problem. If we could break the last clause into several clauses and prove they are equal to the original, then we prove SAT ∝ ≤3SAT.
Fortunately, the way to break the last clause into 3-SAT is exactly the same as how it is done in SAT ∝ 3SAT.
That is, we add y1 and y2 and make the last clause become
x7 ∨ x8 ∨ y1
x9 ∨ -y1 ∨ y2
x10 ∨ x11 ∨ -y2
suppose they are denoted S' and the original clause is S. and, if S is satisfiable, then S' is satisfiable and if S' is satisfiable, then S is satisfiable
Since SAT, which is NP-complete, is polynomially reduced to ≤3SAT, ≤3SAT is also NP-complete.
However, The above proof is quite trivial if we already understand the proof of SAT ∝ 3-SAT.
How to prove that the satisfiability problem with each clause containing at most 3 literals, denoted...
Consider a special version of the 3SAT problem, where every clause has exactly 3 literals, and each variable appears at most 3 times. Show that this version of 3SAT can be solved in polynomial time, by giving a polynomial time algorithm that finds a satisfying assignment. HINT: Consider the bipartite graph with clauses on the left, and variables on the right. Connect a clause to a variable if the variable appears in the clause. Argue that this graph has a...
3. (3 pts) Two well-known NP-complete problems are 3-SAT and TSP, the traveling salesman problem. The 2-SAT problem is a SAT variant in which each clause contains at most two literals. 2-SAT is known to have a polynomial-time algorithm. Is each of the following statements true or false? Justify your answer. a. 3-SAT sp TSP. b. If P NP, then 3-SAT Sp 2-SAT. C. If P NP, then no NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time.
4. The NOT-ALL-EQUAL 3SAT problem is defined as follows: Given a 3-CNF formula F, is there a truth assignment for the variables such that each clause has at least one true literal and at least one false literal? The NOT-ALL-EQUAL 3SAT problem is NP-complete. This question is about trying to reduce the NOT-ALL-EQUAL 3SAT problem to the MAX-CUT problem defined below to show the latter to be NP-complete. A cut in an undirected graph G=(V.E) is a partitioning of the...
7. (10 pts) STINGY SAT is the following problem: given a set of clauses (each a disjunction of literals) and an integer k, find a satisfying assignment in which at most k variables are true, if such an assignment exists. Prove that STINGY SAT is NP-complete.
7. (10 pts) STINGY SAT is the following problem: given a set of clauses (each a disjunction of literals) and an integer k, find a satisfying assignment in which at most k variables are...
Prove this is NP Complete, or it is in P.
This problem is a variant of UNDIRECTED HAMILTON PATH in bounded-degree graphs. The language in question is the set of all triples (G, s, t) for which G is an undirected graph with maximum degree at most 2 containing a Hamilton path from node s to node t.
Design & Analysis of Algorithms
Problem 3. 34.5-1 to prove the subgraph-isomorphism problem is NP-complete.
3, (30 points) Given a directed graph G - N. E), each edge eEhas weight We, 3, (30 points) Given a directed graph G (V, E), each edgee which can be positive or negative. The zero weight cycle problem is that whether exists a simple cycle (each vertex passes at most once) to make the sum of the weights of each edge in G is exactly equal to 0. Prove that the problem is NP complete.
3, (30 points) Given...
Prove that each of the problems below is in the NP class. 4-SAT problem Instance: A Boolean expression E in FNC (normal connective forms), Question: Are there at least four different solutions that make E satisfactory?
Prove each problem, prove by induction
1)Statement 2 Statement: 3 (n-1)n 2forn 2 1
In this assignment, you will prove that the Zero Sum problem is NP-Complete. The Zero Sum problem accepts an array of n integers and returns whether it is possible to negate some of those integers to make the array sum equal 0. For example, the array data = [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11] has a zero sum if you negate the 7 and 11, while the array data = [1, 2, 5, 9, 13, 22] cannot be reduced to...