In Rev. Rul. 70-239, the IRS ruled that the tax consequences of incorporating a partnership would be the same regardless of how the conversion was structured. In Rev. Rul. 84-111, the IRS reversed its position, ruling that the tax consequences of converting a partnership, including an LLC, to a corporation would depend on how the conversion was structured. Such a conversion could be structured either as (1) a contribution by the partnership of its assets to the corporation in return for stock, followed by the liquidation of the partnership; (2) a distribution by the partnership of its assets to its partners, followed by a contribution of those assets by the partners to the new corporation; or (3) a contribution by the partners of their partnership interests to the new corporation in return for stock. Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3(g)(i) provides that a partnership electing to be taxed as a corporation under the check-the-box regulations will be treated as contributing all of its assets to the corporation in return for stock, followed by the liquidation of the partnership. These different structures could have different tax consequences for Turnaround.
If Turnaround contributes all of its assets to a new corporation in return for all of its stock, the transfer itself will be tax-free for the partnership under § 351. Per § 358(a), the LLC will take a basis in the corporate stock equal to its basis in the contributed assets. The liquidation of the LLC will be tax free to the LLC [§ 731(b)] as well as to its members [§ 731(a)]. However, per § 732(b), the basis of the stock in the hands of the original LLC members will equal their basis in their LLC interests, or $0. The corporation will take a basis in the assets equal to that of the LLC’s, or $1,000,000 [§ 362(a)]. The same result would be achieved if the partnership does not legally convert to a corporation but simply elects to be taxed as one under the check-the-box regulations [Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3(g)(i)].
Very different tax consequences will result if Turnaround distributes its assets to its members, followed by a contribution of those assets by the members to the corporation. In that case, the partnership will still recognize no gain or loss on the distribution of its assets [§ 731(b)]. However, the members will recognize gain to the extent that the cash received exceeds their adjusted basis in their interests [§ 731(a)]. As the initial members have no basis in their interests, they will recognize $250,000 gain equal to the amount of cash deemed received by them. The basis of any remaining assets deemed distributed to them will be zero [§ 732(b)]. The contribution of the assets to the corporation will be tax-free under § 351, with the original members taking a basis in their stock equal to the basis of the contributed assets, or $250,000 [§ 358]. The corporation will take a basis in the assets equal to that of the contributors [$500,000 cash + ½($500,000) or $750,000 (§ 362)].
If the members contribute their LLC interests to the corporation in return for stock, the contribution will be tax-deferred under § 351. The old members’ basis in their stock will carry over from their bases in their interests (§ 358); in this case, $0. The corporation will take a basis in its LLC interest from the contributing members (§ 362). Liquidation of the LLC will result in no gain to the corporation unless the cash distributed exceeds the total bases of all the LLC interests contributed [§ 731(a)]. Finally, the corporation will take a basis in the assets equal to the total basis in all of the LLC interests [§ 732(b)].
Again, the tax consequences of the conversion will depend on how it is structured. Liquidation of the LLC while it has cash and the initial members still own their interests (option 2) will trigger the recognition of gain for them. Further, the corporation will have only $750,000 basis in their assets. Contribution of the LLC’s assets or the members’ LLC interests to the corporation will avoid gain recognition by the members as well as potentially provide the corporation greater basis in their assets (either $1,000,000 carryover from the partnership if the partnership contributed its assets to the corporation, or an amount equal to the outside basis of the new partners if the partners contribute their partnership interests). The simplest, and most tax-efficient, approach may be for the LLC to elect to be taxed as a corporation without changing its legal status. Treas. Reg. Sec. 301.7701-3(g)(i) provides that this will be treated as a contribution of assets by the LLC directly to the corporation.
Research Problem 1. Turnaround LLC was formed several years ago. It incurred losses for several years,...
Ten years ago, Sully Truin formed the Academic Recycling Company (ARC) to offer a specialized waste recycling service to schools and colleges. The company has been very successful and has expanded rapidly. To cope with this expansion, Sully has implemented a tight administrative process for operating and monitoring contracts. This administrative procedure is undertaken by the Contracts Office, who track that collections have been made by the field recycling teams. Sully has sole responsibility for obtaining and establishing recycling contracts,...
Abdul LLC has been into hotel Business for nearly 14 years. Their hotels include luxury and boutique hotels incorporating one of the finest services in Oman attracting customers not only from Oman but also from all over the world visiting the country. Apart from accommodation, they offer services which include restaurants, spas and beauty therapy treatments, swimming pools, tennis and badminton courts. In 2018, they are ranked one of the top 10 best hotels in Oman Huge customer base and...
Megahurtz Enterprises, Inc. (“Inc.”) is a closely-held C corporation formed 20 years ago by Adam and Bea Hurtz, who are husband and wife, and Bea’s wealthy uncle, C.D. Rom, to develop and manufacture multimedia entertainment products for personal computers. Inc. has 10,000 shares of common stock and 1,000 shares of nonvoting preferred stock outstanding. At Inc.’s formation, each of the founding shareholders contributed cash in exchange for Inc. common stock, which was the only class outstanding at the time. About...
1 TUVILI UJU ILU 8-1, LO 8-2, LU 8-3, LO 8-4, LO 8-5) Several years ago, your client, Brooks Robertson, started an office cleaning service. His business was very successful, owing much to his legacy as the greatest defensive third baseman in major league history and his nickname, "The Human Vacuum Cleaner." Brooks operated his business as a sole proprietorship and used the cash method of accounting. Brooks was advised by his attorney that it is too risky to operate...
QUESTION 1 Manuela has worked as an accountant in her own accounting business, a sole proprietorship, for more than seven years. Among the services she offers is tax return filing and personal investment advising. Which of the following is true of Manuela’s business? A. Manuela has little control over the management and operations of her business. B. Manuela has unlimited liability. C. Outside funding for the business has been easy for Manuela to obtain. D. Manuela had varied and complicated...
Lisa Frees and Amelia Ellinger have been operating a catering
business for several years. In March, the partners plan to expand
by opening a retail sales shop. They have decided to form the
business as a corporation called Traveling Gourmet, Inc. The
following transactions occurred in March:
Received $100,000 cash from each of the two shareholders to
form the corporation, in addition to $4,000 in accounts receivable,
$9,300 in equipment, a van (equipment) appraised at a fair value of
$17,000,...
Lisa Frees and Amelia Ellinger have been operating a catering
business for several years. In March, the partners plan to expand
by opening a retail sales shop. They have decided to form the
business as a corporation called Traveling Gourmet, Inc. The
following transactions occurred in March: Received $87,000 cash
from each of the two shareholders to form the corporation, in
addition to $2,700 in accounts receivable, $6,700 in equipment, a
van (equipment) appraised at a fair value of $14,400,...
Lisa Frees and Amelia Ellinger have been operating a catering
business for several years. In March, the partners plan to expand
by opening a retail sales shop. They have decided to form the
business as a corporation called Traveling Gourmet, Inc. The
following transactions occurred in March: Received $83,000 cash
from each of the two shareholders to form the corporation, in
addition to $2,300 in accounts receivable, $5,900 in equipment, a
van (equipment) appraised at a fair value of $13,600,...
Lisa Frees and Amelia Ellinger have been operating a catering business for several years. In March, the partners plan to expand by opening a retail sales shop. They have decided to form the business as a corporation called Traveling Gourmet, Inc. The following transactions occurred in March: a. Received $96,000 cash from each of the two shareholders to form the corporation, in addition to $3,600 in accounts receivable, $8,500 in equipment, a van (equipment) appraised at a fair value of...
Part I: Initial Expansion Gonzales is a closely held corporation considering a major expansion. The proposed expansion would require the firm to raise $10 million in additional capital. Because Gonzales currently has 50 percent debt and because the family members already have all their funds tied up in the business, the owners cannot supply any additional equity, so the company will have to sell stock to the public. The family wants to ensure that it will retain control of the...