Question

9. With a previous contractor, the mean time to replace a streetlight was 3.2 days. A city councilwoman thinks that the new c
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Here we want to test

Ho : mu = 3.200 Vs H1 : mu > 3.200

Level of significance a = 0.05

P-value = 0.036

Decision rule : If p-value < alpha we reject the null hypothesis otherwise we fail to reject the null hypothesis

Our p-value = 0.036 < 0.05

Decision : reject the null hypothesis Ho

Conclusion : There is enough evidence to support the councilwoman's belief .

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
9. With a previous contractor, the mean time to replace a streetlight was 3.2 days. A...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 25)With a previous contractor, the average time to replace a lamppost in the city was 3.0...

    25)With a previous contractor, the average time to replace a lamppost in the city was 3.0 days. A city councilwoman thinks the new contractor is not quickly replacing the streetlights. She selects a random sample of 12 streetlight service calls and gets the following replacement times (in days). 6.2, 7.1, 5.4, 5.5, 7.5, 2.6, 4.3, 2.9, 3.7, 0.7, 5.6 ,1.7 Because the sample size is small, you should verify that the replacement time is normally distributed and the sample does...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT