Answer: Note that this is a zero sum game. The sum of payoffs of the two players in any given cell is exactly zero. Lets proceed to the answers.
(a) The strategy set for each player consists of only 2 possibilities - Head or Tail.
(b) To find a dominant strategy for player 1, let's consider the strategy available to player 2. If player 2 plays H, player one earns a positive payoff by playing H. If player 2 plays T, player 1 earns a positive payoff by playing T. Thus, there is no dominant strategy for player 1, which always gives him the largest payoff irrespective of the strategy played by player 2.
Likewise, there is no dominant strategy for player 2. It changes with the strategy played by player 1.
(c) No, there does not exist any Nash equilibrium in pure strategy in this game. A Nash equilibrium is one which is a mutual best response for all the players in the game, and does not provide an incentive to deviate to any player.
For example, consider the strategy set (H, H). Can it be a Nash equilibrium ? Clearly not, as player 2 has an incentive to deviate to "T" instead of playing "H".
Likewise, we can rule out the other strategy pairs - (H, T), (T, H), (T, T).
(d) To find the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategy, refer to the images below:


(e) To see how the mixed strategy equilibrium is obtained by the intersection of the best response curves, refer to the image below:

Q.2 Consider the following normal-form game: Player 2 Player 1 3,2 1,1 -1,3 R. 0,0 Q.2.a Identify the pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Q.2.b Identify the mixed-strategy Nash equilibria Q.2.c Calculate each player's expected equilibrium payoff.
2. (15 points) Consider the following 2 x 2 game: T B L R 3, 75. 2 6, 31, 10 Let p be the probability that player 2 plays R and let q be the probability that player 1 plays T. Draw a pair of axes with p on the horizontal axis and q on the vertical axis. Draw two lines, one indicating player 1's best response(s) as a function of p and another indicating player 2's best response(s) as...
need d, e and f answered. first picture is just for reference to
the questions.
nsider the Game of Chicken depicted in the figure below, in which t each other must decide whether or not to swerve. Player 2 Straight Swerve Player 1 Straight 0, 0 Swerve1,3 3, 1 2, 2 have a strictly dominant strategy? What about Player 2? best responses for Player 1? And for Player 2? any pure strategy Nash Equilibrium (psNE) in this game? d. Find...
True or False for each blank
Consider the following simultaneous game: R Player 2 L 30.10 -10,20 Player 1 U 10, 20 D 5,-10 Please indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Player 1 has a dominant strategy. This game has a Nash equilibrium. < This game has a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. V Player 1's best response is D if player 2 plays R. <
4) (20 points) Consider the following two player simultaneous move game which is another version of the Battle of the Sexes game. Bob Opera Alice 4,1 Opera Football Football 0,0 1,4 0,0 Suppose Alice plays a p - mix in which she plays Opera with probability p and Football with probability (1 – p) and Bob plays a q- mix in which he plays Opera with probability q and Football with probability (1 – 9). a) Find the mixed strategy...
Player lI C D E A 0,0 0,2 2,1 В 1,2 1,1 0,0 Player B Consider the strategic form game above and select all that apply. Strategy A is not dominant for Player 1. Strategy B is weakly dominant for player I. Strategy E is dominated by strategies C and D for player 2. Strategy E is never a best response.
1. (60 marks) Consider a two-person game, in which every player has two pure strategies to play. The payoff matrix of the game is as follows Strategy 2 Player One Player Two Strategy I Strategy II Strategy 1 0,0 1,3 1,1 Find all the Nash equilibria of the game.
onsider the following two person static game where Player 1 is the row player and Player 2 is the column player C D E A 1,1 0,2 2,0 B 0,0 1,-1 -1,3 a. There is an equilibrium where Player 1 plays A with probability 3/4. b. There is an equilibrium where Player 1 plays A with probability 2/3. c. There is an equilibrium where Player 1 plays A with probability 1/2. d. There is no mixed strategy Nash equilibrium.
Player II D E F A 2,6 0A 4A В 3,3 0,0 1,5 С 1,1 3,5 2,3 Player Consider the game above. Suppose Player 1 conjectures that Player 2 plays D with probability 1/4, E with probability 1/8, and F with probability 5/8. Player 1's best response to her conjecture about Player 2's strategy is to play a. A b. B OC.C . Another mixed strategy.
The following matrix gives the payoff for Player 1 and Player 2 with R and L strategies. Assume that they determine their strategies simultaneously and independently. Player 2 R L R (5, 4) (-1, -1) Player 1 L (-1, -1) (2, 2) (a) Does Player 1 have a dominant strategy? Why or why not? What is its dominant strategy, if existing? (b) Does Player 2 have a dominant strategy? Why or why not? What is its dominant strategy, if existing?...