Question

• In recent years, Planned Parenthood has decided to shift away from the labels of "pro-choice" and "pro-life" with regard to pregnancy and abortion because approaching these issues in such polarizing, political terms is not very helpful to those who are actually making these kinds of highly personal decisions. What is your perspective on this change?
  • Discuss the apparent contradiction involved in legislative efforts that seek to limit access to health care services that might prevent unplanned pregnancies (e.g. Planned Parenthood or birth control information and services) and to oppose sex education in schools unless it's abstinence-only, while simultaneously opposing not only abortion but other social services that would help children born as a result of unplanned pregnancy?

Answer 1

The pro choice and pro life legislation are witnessing a change in US. New legislation in brought to prevent abortion after 6 weeks of pregnancy. Pregancy and other realted isuues are real time issues of every indvidual and the sate intruding into it is a serious issue to be adressed. In case if chice between life a deadth of child and mother individual should be givan freedom to choose between both. It is also need to understand that a child in mothers womb have every right to born into the world. abortion is one form of denial of right to a child in mothers womb. Planned preganacy is highly hindered in the US by new law. infcat it gives room of 6 weeks which would be suffiucent time to plan for the same.

Opposing social services to children born as aresult of unplanned pregnacy is contrdiction to new legislation. it is purely a decision that oput the parents or singkle parent into trouble. state need to rework this legislation to support the new legislation. othrwise it wil be a bolt form above to the peole who belong to lower strata of the society