Question

10 Aignment (1) - Protected View - Saved. Mailings Review View Help contains Unless you need to edit it's safe to stay in Protected View Enable Editing Week 10 Assignment Data A psychologist wanted to know if students in her class were more likely to cheat if they were low achievers. She divided her 60 students into three groups (low, middle, and high) based on their mean exam score on the previous three tests. She then asked them to rate how likely they were to cheat on an exam if the opportunity presented itself with very limited chance for consequences. The students rated their desire to cheat on a scale ranging from 1-100, with lower numbers indicating less desire to cheat. 1. Before opening the data, what would you hypothesize about this research question? 2. Open the data set. Before running any statistical analyses, glance through the data. Do you think that your hypothesis will be supported? 3. Conduct descriptive analyses and report them here. 4. Conduct a one-way ANOVA. Report your statistical findings (including any applicable tables in APA format) here. 5. What would you conclude from this analysis? What would be your next steps, if this were your research project?

Answer 1

were low acheivers Mean score on data from the observed wanted to - A PRychologist know if students in her class tikely to cheat if they were She divided Go students into there groups ( low, middle § high) based on their course the previous three Course testings. Shen then asked them to vale how likely they were to cheat course testings if the opportunity presented itself with very limited The students rated their desire to cheat On a scale of anging from 1 - 100 with lower numbere indicating Lees desire to cheal wing spss soft ware Test of Between Subjects effects a chance for consequences. 1 Dependent variable: cheat source Type 1 Sum of sa's df 19597.4259 5 F Mean Square 3919.4901b I corrected model 28.572 0.00 16 214. 115 1 9258. 292 1204.341 0.00 18516.584 2 401-532 67.489 0.00 Intexcept Acheivement grp henden Acheivement group & Gender EtyOY 401-532 177. 958 2.927 6.093 355. 916 137.181 1.29710-282 7407.798 193959.00 54 60 Toral corrected Total 27005. 250 The 59 Acheivement gop p-value for the factor acheivement group and less than significance, we can conclude that acheivement group significant effect on cheat. 0.000 0.05 level of

o signibicance. Hence, we does not have a significant cao en Gender :- The p-value for the factor Cender is 0.093 and greater than 0.05 level conclude that gendee effect cheal. Interaction ocheievement aroup & Gender in The p-value bor the interaction dlo Acheivement Group and gender 0.282 and than 0.05 Hence can conclude that there significant interaction effect on cheat. greater level of significance. we is no AS per che gg rules I have to solve Only One questions at time. please rest of the questions post seperately. please give up- vote for my work.