Question

Research the following case: Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660, 557 P.2d 106, 134 Cal....

Research the following case: Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660, 557 P.2d 106, 134 Cal. Rptr. 815 (1976) Submit a case brief using the following IRAC format:

Facts: Detail what happened in your own words. Issue: What is the legal question to be answered before the court? Holding: The answer to the question Rule of Law: What does the law state? Analysis: Explain why the court ruled the way it did. Conclusion: Tie it all together

You will be graded on spelling, grammar, content, organization, and formatting.
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

IRAC or issue, rule, application and conclusion is a format used for summarizing legal cases for easy analysis.

The case: Marvin Vs Marvin

  • Michelle Marvin plaintiff and appellant
  • Lee Marvin defendant and respondent

Use the case details in the following script to right the4 asects of the rule in your own words.

The Marvin's were living out of wedlock for 7 years, during which time they purchased properties , but said properties were in taken in the name of the defendant. But there was an oral agreement between them that they would share the proceeds. Michelle had become a housemaker giving up all her career of a singer and an entertainer on the behest of Lee and in return was ensured a good living standard by Lee. But the live in relationship broke up with Michelle getting support for one year after which Lee refused to support her. She filed a case that she wanted half her share of all the properties and her support entitlement even though the agreement were oral.

The law until this case stated that a verbal agreement within a marraige is justified and needs to be upheld. After this case the court realised that a live in relationship of a long term nature also falls under the same premise and any verbal agreements both expressed and implied have to be upheld by the court. The court ruled for the defendant

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Research the following case: Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660, 557 P.2d 106, 134 Cal....
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Case: Jannusch v. Naffziger - 379 Ill. App. 3d 381, 318 Ill. Dec. 480, 883 N.E.2d...

    Case: Jannusch v. Naffziger - 379 Ill. App. 3d 381, 318 Ill. Dec. 480, 883 N.E.2d 711 (2008) Facts: Gene and Martha Jannusch owned Festival Foods, which served snacks at events throughout Illinois and Indiana. The business included a truck, servicing trailer, refrigerators, roasters, chairs, and tables. Lindsey and Louann Naffziger orally agreed to buy Festival Foods for $150,000, the deal including all the assets and the opportunity to work at events secured by the Jannuschs. The Naffzigers paid $10,000...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT