Question

1.  The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 is seen as providing much-needed flexibility and security for families and workers. Others think that it places an unnecessary burden on business. Yet another opinion is that the act hurts women, who are more likely to ask for leave, and shuffles them off to a low-paid “mommy track” career path. In your opinion, what are the likely consequencesoftheact?Youcanadoptoneoftheviewpoints just expressed or develop another. Explain your answer.

2.  How do you know a selection device is valid? What are the possible consequences of using invalid selection methods? How can an organization ensure that its selection methods are valid?

3. Consider a job that you have held or with which you are familiar. Describe how you think an organization could best provide an RJP for that position. What types of information and experiences should be conveyed to applicants? What techniques should be used to convey the information and experiences?

4.  How would managing nonunionized workers differ from managing workers who elected to be in a union? Which would be easier? Why?

5.  In what ways would managing temporary workers be easier than managing traditional permanent employees? In what ways would it be more difficult? What differences would likely exist in your own behavior if you were in a contingent or temporary job versus a traditional permanent job

Answer 1

Implementation of the family and medical leave act of 1993 definitely increases the adaptability and capabilities of an individual working in the organisation. This type of approach enables a woman to create a better impact on her health rather than consistently being forced for work by an organisation. This implementation of the law increases their right to use their capabilities of taking leave in a right manner. Implementation of this specific law is definitely more helpful in creating a work life balance where availability of the work according to the different situation changes. If this was not implemented in the organisations then level of hardship for women and families would have drastically increased as these rules and regulations provide adequate level of support to operability of any specific women in workplace and also helps to maintain better quality of standard from the employees to get the specific benefits.

P.S.- please use separate Threads to ask multiple choice questions.