A replacement analysis is being done for a vacuum seal on a spacecraft. The current seal can be used for 10 more years, or a new one can be purchased and used instead. The new seal would cost $25,000, and there would be an annual $5,000 of maintenance cost. It is estimated the seal could be sold for $7,000 in 10 years. The current seal can be sold now for $9,000 or for $2,000 in 10 years. The required annual maintenance cost is $7,500 Using 10 years for both alternatives and 12% cost of capital, calculate the present worth of both the defender and the challenger and determine whether the seal should be replaced.
NEW SEAL
| Year | Cash Flow | PV Factor | PV | |
| A | 1 / (1+12%)^Year | A X PV Factor | ||
| New Seal Cost | 0 | $ 25,000 | 1.00 | $ 25,000 |
| Current seal sale | 0 | $ (9,000) | 1.00 | $ (9,000) |
| Annual maintenance | 1 | $ 5,000 | 0.89 | $ 4,464 |
| Annual maintenance | 2 | $ 5,000 | 0.80 | $ 3,986 |
| Annual maintenance | 3 | $ 5,000 | 0.71 | $ 3,559 |
| Annual maintenance | 4 | $ 5,000 | 0.64 | $ 3,178 |
| Annual maintenance | 5 | $ 5,000 | 0.57 | $ 2,837 |
| Annual maintenance | 6 | $ 5,000 | 0.51 | $ 2,533 |
| Annual maintenance | 7 | $ 5,000 | 0.45 | $ 2,262 |
| Annual maintenance | 8 | $ 5,000 | 0.40 | $ 2,019 |
| Annual maintenance | 9 | $ 5,000 | 0.36 | $ 1,803 |
| Annual maintenance | 10 | $ 5,000 | 0.32 | $ 1,610 |
| New seal sale | 10 | $ (7,000) | 0.32 | $ (2,254) |
| $ 41,997 |
CURRENT SEAL
| Year | Cash Flow | PV Factor | PV | |
| A | 1 / (1+12%)^Year | A X PV Factor | ||
| Annual maintenance | 1 | $ 7,500 | 0.89 | $ 6,696 |
| Annual maintenance | 2 | $ 7,500 | 0.80 | $ 5,979 |
| Annual maintenance | 3 | $ 7,500 | 0.71 | $ 5,338 |
| Annual maintenance | 4 | $ 7,500 | 0.64 | $ 4,766 |
| Annual maintenance | 5 | $ 7,500 | 0.57 | $ 4,256 |
| Annual maintenance | 6 | $ 7,500 | 0.51 | $ 3,800 |
| Annual maintenance | 7 | $ 7,500 | 0.45 | $ 3,393 |
| Annual maintenance | 8 | $ 7,500 | 0.40 | $ 3,029 |
| Annual maintenance | 9 | $ 7,500 | 0.36 | $ 2,705 |
| Annual maintenance | 10 | $ 7,500 | 0.32 | $ 2,415 |
| Current seal sale | 10 | $ (2,000) | 0.32 | $ (644) |
| $ 41,733 |
Current seal is better. Replacement is NOT required
A replacement analysis is being done for a vacuum seal on a spacecraft. The current seal...
In a replacement analysis for a vacuum seal on a spacecraft, the following data are known about the challenger: the initial investment is $10,500; there is no annual maintenance cost for the first three years, however, it will be $2,300 in each of years four and five, and then $4,300 in the sixth year and increasing by $3,000 each year thereafter. The salvage value is $0 at all times, and MARR is 8% per year. What is the economic life...
in a replacement analysis for a vaccum seal on a
spacecraft the following data are known about the challenger, the
initial investment is 7,000. there is no annual maintenance cost
for the first three years, however, it will be 3,800 in each of
years four and five, and then 4,900 in the sixth year and
increasing by 3,300 each year thereafter. The salvage value is 0 at
all times and MARR is 8% per year. What is the economic life...
A current asset (defender) is being evaluated for potential replacement. it was purchased 4 years ago at a cost of 62,000. it has been depreciated as a MACRS (GDS) 5 year property class asset. The corresponding depreciation rates are 20%,32%,19.2%,11.52%,11.5%,and 5.76%. The present MV of the defender is 15,000. Its remaining useful life is estimated to be 4 years, but it will require additional repair worknow(a one time 3,700 expense) to provide continuing service equivalent to the challenger. the current...
Engineering Economic Analysis. Please do out, not excel.
9-13. Use the PW method to select the better of the following alternatives: Annual Expenses Alternative A Alternative B Defender: Challenger: Labor Material insurance and S300,000 S250,000 250,000 4% of initial 100.000 None property taxes capital investment Maintenance Leasing cost $8,000 None None $100,000 Assume that the defender was installed five years ago. The MARR is 10% per year. (97) Definition of alternatives: A: Retain an already owned machine (defender) in service...
One alternative is to replace 18. Typically, there are two alternatives in a replacement analysis. the defrender now. The other alternative is which of the following? A. Keep the defender for its remaining useful life. B. Keep the defender for another year and then reexamine the situation. Censthe defender until an improved chalenger better than the current challenger comes to market D. Keep the defender as long as it's operational 19. A hospital in The Upper Cumberland area bought a...
Four years ago, Thomas bought an industrial-grade snowblower and started a business clearing sidewalks for churches, parks, and for the city government. Because of increasing maintenance costs for the snowblower, he is considering replacing it with a new machine. The defender was originally purchased for $1,000 and could be sold now for $700. Maintenance costs for the defender were $60 in year one (four years ago) and have increased by a uniform gradient of $15 per year ever since. In...
A mechanical engineer designs and sells equipment that automates manual labor processes. He is offering a machine/robot combination that will significantly reduce labor costs associated with manufacturing garage-door opener transmitters. The equipment has a first cost of $150,000, an estimated annual operating cost of $39,000, a maximum useful life of 5 years, and a $19,000 salvage value anytime it is replaced. The existing equipment was purchased 12 years ago for $65,000 and has an annual operating cost of $78,000. The...
The replacement of a planning machine is being considered by the Reardom Furniture Company. (There is an indefinite future need for this type of machine.) The best challenger will cost $25,000 for installation and will have an estimated economic life of 13 years and a $1,800 MV at that time. It is estimated that annual expenses will average $15,500 per year. The defender has a present BV of $5,500 and a present MV of $3500. Data for the defender for...
QUESTION 3 (25 MARKS) FKP C nve years ago. The company CEO wants to know if the equipment should be replaced now or at any other time over the next 3 years to minimize the cost of producing miniature background suppression sensors. Since the present equipment or the proposed equipment can be used for any or all of the 3-year period, one of the company's manufacturing engineers produced AW cost information for the defender and challenger as shown below. The...
how we got the table
Economic Life of a Defender (Existing Asset) It is desired to determine how much longer a forklift truck should remain in service before it is replaced by the new truck (challenger) for which data were given in Example 9-4 and Table 9-2. The defender in this case is two years old, $7.500. It kept, its originally cost $19.500, and has a present realizable MV of $7,500 MVs and annual expenses are expected to be as...