Kathy works for Judge Judy in an Oklahoma courthouse. Kathy finds out that Judge Judy is about to issue a search warrant to the police to search the house of her boyfriend Jim. Kathy sends Jim a series of text messages from her personal iPhone warning Jim to get the house "cleaned up," and Jim sends several back to her. Kathy is charged with the crime of obstruction of justice, and the state issues a search warrant for her text message records. According to Case 7.3, State of Oklahoma v. Marcum, Kathy most likely has a reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment with respect to her text message records, and would not have to turn over those records.
Group of answer choices
True
False
FALSE
Reason: On the lines similar to the State V. Marcum case, since the messages were both sent and received, there is no expectation of privacy and thus Kathy will also come under scrutiny for obstruction of justice.
Kathy works for Judge Judy in an Oklahoma courthouse. Kathy finds out that Judge Judy is...
1-Summarize the article briefly in your own words. 2-Explain the main theme of this case and its implications for the future of forensic science. 3-Several genealogy sites (including ancestry.com, 23andme.com, familytreedna.com, findmypast.com) were used in this case -- do you believe that law enforcement should have access to these databases as a standard practice? Why or why n Article How a Jane Doe child case uncovered a serial killer, identified victims and changed the use of DNA forensics Investigators and...