contract; vice versa for principal
In the case of the agent, if the principal has a wrongfully terminated agency, then the agent has the full right to ask for the compensation for the work performed by the agency or it can also sue the principal by considering he contract as still existing and can ask for the damage.
On the other hand, if the contract is broken by the agency, the principal has the legal right to sue the agency for the damage caused by the sudden termination of the contract and damages can be asked from the agent.
If Principal wrongfully terminates agency, agent may sue for _____ ___ ____ or implied contract; vice...
an agency contract may be created by oral appointment of an agent. true or false
QUESTION 38 An agent has implied Authority when: a. The principal has ratified past actions, leading third persons to believe authority exists b. The principal fails to give written notice to past customer after terminating the agency C. An emergency makes necessary prompt action by the agent in order to safeguard the property interests of the principal d. Any of the above one cher 2 points Save Answer Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers...
Agency is a legal term of art that refers to the relationship between a principal and an agent. An agency relationship is a fiduciary relationship, where one person (called the “principal”) allows an agent to act on his or her behalf. The agent is subject to the principal’s control and must consent to her instructions. Classic examples of agency relationships include employer/employee, lawyer/client, and corporation/officer. All that is required to create an agency relationship is the manifestation of assent by...
Abigail Agent is asked by Principal to buy a parcel of real estate for Principal's business expansion, but not to reveal the existence of the agency relationship. It is unconscionable for Agent to trick the third party by not disclosing the agency. Agent may be liable to the third party. Agent can have no liability to the third party, only Principal is liable. Third Party has no recourse against either Principal or Agent. Principal cannot be liable to Third Party
An agent with a conflict of interest to the principal: Must act in his own self interest. Is probably committing fraud unless the agent fully discloses the conflict of interest to the principal. May still represent the principal without disclosing the conflict of interest. All of the above ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An agent is liable to third parties when The principal is fully disclosed and the agent has only apparent authority. The principal is fully disclosed and the agent has only implied...
A principal is not liable to a third party for any contract made by the agent acting outside the scope of his or her authority. True False The purpose of antitrust law is to prevent competition. True False
Question 6 1 pts A principal can ratify an agreement made without authorization on his or her behalf by one who is not his or her agent. True False Question 7 1 pts An agent must notify the principal of all material matters that come to his or her attention regarding the subject matter of the agency. True False Question 8 1 pts A principal may confer authority on an agent only in writing. True False Question 9 1 pts...
Agency theory has two principle lines: positivist and principal-agent, what are the differences? Which do you believe is a better predictor of behavior? Why?
58. A force majeure clause in a contract permits the cancellation of a contract based on an extraordinary or unexpected event like an act of God, fire, or labor dispute should occur during the life of the contract? T of F 61. When come into contact a law enforcement officer investigating a crime and you are a possible suspect it is always best: 1. Be honest and helpful 2. Try your best to avoid answering any questions 3. Make sure...
d. Neither Wanamaker nor Anderson is liable on the contract since the seller was obli. pated to ascertain Anderson's authority. has the right to regain possession of tomobile and to collect damages. Brian may sue and collect from either Rob- Inson or Ambrose Il Amorost must pay in damages, he will be entitled to Indemnification from Robin son. Ambron notllable for the wrongful Teposion of the wtomobile since he was obeying the direct order of Robinson 22. Under which of...