Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Inc., as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of riskless inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified.
A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an
inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next:
| Coefficient of Variation |
Adjustment Factor |
||||
| 0 | − | .25 | .90 | ||
| .26 | − | .50 | .80 | ||
| .51 | − | .75 | .70 | ||
| .76 | − | 1.00 | .60 | ||
| 1.01 | − | 1.25 | .50 | ||
Assume a $164,000 project provides the following inflows with the
associated coefficients of variation for each year.
| Year | Inflow | Coefficient of Variation | ||||
| 1 | $ | 31,700 | .17 | |||
| 2 | 56,500 | .25 | ||||
| 3 | 75,000 | .51 | ||||
| 4 | 62,100 | .75 | ||||
| 5 | 67,800 | 1.07 | ||||
Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final
answer using the formula and financial calculator methods.
a. Fill in the table below: (Do not round
intermediate calculations. Round your dollar answers to the nearest
whole dollar.)
b-1. If the risk-free rate is 4 percent, compute
the net present value of the adjusted inflows. (Negative
amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not
round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal
places.)
b-2. Should this project be accepted?
| No | |
| Yes |
Requirement (a) – Adjusted Inflow
|
Year |
Adjustment Factor |
Adjusted Inflow ($) |
|
1 |
0.90 |
28,530 |
|
2 |
0.90 |
50,850 |
|
3 |
0.70 |
52,500 |
|
4 |
0.70 |
43,470 |
|
5 |
0.50 |
33,900 |
Requirement (b)(1) - The net present value of the adjusted inflows.
|
Year |
Annual cash inflows ($) |
Present Value factor at 4% |
Present Value of Cash inflow ($) |
|
1 |
28,530 |
0.961538 |
27,432.69 |
|
2 |
50,850 |
0.924556 |
47,013.68 |
|
3 |
52,500 |
0.888996 |
46,672.31 |
|
4 |
43,470 |
0.854804 |
37,158.34 |
|
5 |
33,900 |
0.821927 |
27,863.33 |
|
TOTAL |
1,86,140.35 |
||
Net Present Value of the Project (NPV) = Total Present Value of Annual cash inflows - Initial Investment
= $1,86,140.35 - $164,000
= $22,140.35
Requirement (b)(2) – DECISION
“YES”. The project should be accepted, since the Net Present Value of the Project is Positive $22,140.35.
NOTE
The formula for calculating the Present Value Inflow Factor (PVIF) is [1 / (1 + r)n], where “r” is the Discount Rate/Cost of capital and “n” is the number of years.
Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family...
Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Inc., as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then...
Risk-adjusted rates of return using CAPM Centennial Catering, Inc., is considering two mutually exclusive investments. The company wishes to use a CAPM-type risk-adjusted discount rate (RADR) in its analysis. Centennial's managers believe that the appropriate market rate of return is 12.3%, and they observe that the current risk-free rate of return is 7.4%. Cash flows associated with the two projects are shown in the following table. (Click on the icon located on the top-right corner of the data table below...